Darwin on the Right: Why Christians and conservatives should accept evolution

Scientific American ^ | October 2006 issue | Michael Shermer

[Dimensio]

Still I am relating what I read from the 1970's.

Carbon dating has never been able to yeild a date of "millions" of years. You are either not remembering accurately, or the source of your information was lying to you.

And you've provided NO "proof" of the monkey-man theory yet either.

Absolutely no scientific claims are proven. You have been told this before, so your statement is wholly irrational.

[Coyoteman]

- My bad, I thought you were still harping about the mollusk.

Did you get the post I sent your way last night about radiocarbon dating freshwater mollusks found in limestone-rich water?

There have been so many posts (well over a thousand now) that its sometimes hard to keep track.

Anyway, I have read some of the original articles (most are in Radiocarbon), and can help you understand some of these anomalous results if you like.

[presently no screen name]

While you choose to remain ignorant

That is a personal inflammatory remark! I DEMAND AN APOLOGY!

[Coyoteman]

This thread is devolving again time to bail out for the night ===> Placemarker <===

[Dimensio]

- The MYTH of evolution

Please demonstrate that the theory of evolution is a "MYTH".

TRUE Biblical based Christianity/Christian Faith.

Please demonstrate that Christianity is "TRUE". Also demonstrate that the theory of evolution does "diametrically oppose" Christianity.

[PatrickHenry]

Everything is wonderful, placemarker.

[presently no screen name]

While you choose to remain ignorant

That is a personal inflammatory remark! I DEMAND AN APOLOGY!

[Dimensio]

My statement is true. You have made false claims on the subject of evolution, demonstrating that you willfully refuse to educate yourself on the subject. You then believe that because you have chosen to ignore information on the theory of evolution that no information exists.

You have also claimed that Warrior of Justice is "right all the time", even though he has made a demonstratably false claim.

[Dimensio]

- Nah, it means it a MYTH.

Please demonstrate that the theory of evolution is a "MYTH".

[Dimensio]

I apologize for stating that you are willfully ignorant. This does not change the fact that you have repeatedly made demonstratably false claims.

[presently no screen name]

I know. Zillion. That's a word I never use. Let me use it in a sentence. You were wrong a zillion times tonight. :)

[presently no screen name]

While you choose to remain ignorant

That is a personal inflammatory remark! I DEMAND AN APOLOGY

[Dimensio]

I have provided an apology.

[Dimensio]

- Because there is NO UNIFORMITY to the evo-MYTH. There many, many versions.

Please explain what you mean by this with specific examples.

And the dates and evidence are "up-dated", i.e. changed/TAMPERED WITH from time to time.

When and how has this occured? Please provide specific references.

Remember that skeleton from Africa that was supposedly the fossil remains of the "mother of all human life"?

What about this?

Nevermind that verifiable history says that the CRADLE of Civilization, the beginnings of man are in The fertile cresent, ie.e PERSIA.

You are suggesting that humans as a species did not exist until civilization existed. There is no evidence to support your claim.

- I already dealt with the DNA question. DNA does NOT support evolution because there are differeing views within the evo-MYTH community as to the details of this particular part of the MYTH. And, AGAIN, MANY SCIENTISTS do not fall for the evo-MYTH.

You are again providing vague assertions without any specific claims. How, exactly, does DNA evidence "not" support the theory of evolution? What do you mean by "differeng views"? Give an example of "differing views". Merely claiming that there are "differing views" does not show that DNA evidence falsifies the theory of evolution.