Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cause Whores [Anglicans, Israel and Palestinians]
Midwest Conservative Journal ^ | 6/30/2005 | Christopher Johnson

Posted on 07/01/2005 12:02:08 PM PDT by sionnsar

click here to read article

1 posted on 07/01/2005 12:02:08 PM PDT by sionnsar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ahadams2; anselmcantuar; Agrarian; coffeecup; Paridel; keilimon; Hermann the Cherusker; ...
Traditional Anglican ping, continued in memory of its founder Arlin Adams.

FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this moderately high-volume ping list (typically 3-7 pings/day).
This list is pinged by sionnsar and newheart.

Resource for Traditional Anglicans:

Speak the truth in love. Eph 4:15

2 posted on 07/01/2005 12:02:38 PM PDT by sionnsar (†† || Iran Azadi || <Airbus A380)^: The BIG PIG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar
Israel brings out the stupid in the ACC
Wannabe Newbie Anglican

Nothing seems to bring out the evil and sheer stupidity of man like existence of God’s chosen people, Israel. And so there is no misunderstanding, I do mean that as a bad reflection on mankind, not on Israel.

History is full of hatred of Israel – and of the stupidity that produces. In the book of Esther, Haman has it made. He’s high up in government and is living the life. But his genocidal hatred of Jews proves his undoing. In modern times, the Arab nations’ slowness to accept the existence of the small nation of Israel resulted in their getting their butts kicked – four times.

Now the Anglican Consultative Council has made fools of themselves as well in their resolution concerning Israel.

I’ll be very charitable and not say anti-semitism was behind it, although I fully understand those who do. And ++Rowan Williams is wisely doing some damage control in saying it wasn’t a divestment resolution.

But what is very clear is how stupid this resolution is. For starters, where is the sense of proportion? So maybe Israel isn’t perfect in everything they do. They are a nation under prolonged terrorist attack. Yet they have gone beyond the call of duty to try to bring about peace, including giving back most of the land that they won fair and square in defensive wars. But this resolution says there are being too mean to the terrorists and their supporters. What rubbish! (I could use stronger words, but I’m Anglican now, you know.)

And isn’t there a multitude of governments in the world far more deserving of public rebuke than that of Israel? Heck, I have more problems with the shiny happy gulag of Canada than with Israel.

This resolution feeds Jewish perception of Christians as being anti-semitic. It’s a therefore a terrible negative witness. This resolution combined with those coming from the World Council of Churches, the Presbyterian Church USA, and their ilk has already undone many years of efforts to improve Jewish-Christian relations.

The fallout has been strong and swift as documented over at the Midwest Conservative Journal. There is widespread outrage. And, frankly, there should be.

If this resolution ever does any good, it won’t come close to outweighing the ill will it has created.

Maybe there wasn’t any anti-semitism behind it. But there sure was an abundance of stupidity.

3 posted on 07/01/2005 12:11:05 PM PDT by sionnsar (†† || Iran Azadi || <Airbus A380)^: The BIG PIG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar
I once heard David Pryce-Jones, the learned English novelist and historian, talking about a new instance of the phenomenon of fellow-traveling: the fellow-travelers of Palestine.

Yeah. There are also fellow-travelers of "Bosnia" and "Kosova", who tend to also be fellow-travelers of "Palestine". It's no wonder--they're all dhimmis, pure and simple!!!!

The liberal Anglicans/Episcopalians think that as long as they have "bishops", and use the "right" liturgy (even if they cross their fingers when saying or singing parts of it), then they are Christians, and all is OK. But they forget that the whole point of bishops is to connect us to the faith of the Apostles, and to defend that faith!!!! If they have fake "bishops" like Spong and "Selfish Gene" Robinson, who deny and desecrate all that is apostolic, they have nothing at all but a gnostic club, not a church.

4 posted on 07/01/2005 2:33:12 PM PDT by Honorary Serb (Kosovo is Serbia! Free Srpska! Abolish ICTY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar
More and more, I think that this ACC resolution is the worst thing Anglican Christianity has ever done in the last hundred years, far worse than the consecration of Gene Robinson and New Westminster's approval of same-sex marriage.

Of course I'm not Anglican, but I would think that reversing a teaching of the deposit of faith (doctrine on the morality of homosexual activity) has got to be worse than a mere prudential statement of political opinion, no matter how wrongheaded.

5 posted on 07/01/2005 3:18:13 PM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson