Posted on 09/26/2004 4:54:51 PM PDT by bonaventura
Sad to say, but mass in "Ebonics" is already here in both NY and Chicago.....complete with Kente cloth vestments, the worst possible gospel music, liturgical dance, and women dancing & hopping around with flaming pots of ceremonial inscence - as if it were a pagan ritual. They even celebrate the "made-up" pagan festival of Kwaanza....complete with story telling, songs, dance, and tribal drumming.
That has even happened in St. Patrick's Cathedral.
How much longer, O Lord?
The notable exception was Patriarch Nikon's reforms of the Slavonic Liturgy, but the point there was to bring the Slavonic texts into exact correlation with the existing Greek texts (the Slavonic practices were in many, if not most, cases older), which had undergone further gradual changes.
I had assumed that the process surrounding Vat II was like that in the Orthodox Church -- translating existing texts from languages people don't understand to those they do.
The Vatican certainly had the right to change the Mass -- none of my business. But don't you think that many people in the pews assumed that the "new Mass" was just a translation of the "Old Mass?"
Bingo!
I think Berlioz uses it in his Symphonie Fantastique! Indeed the Requiem Chant is used quite a bit by Classical composers. A wonderful example is Durrufle's Requiem, 20th century but gorgeous.
ROFLOL
And, sad to say, a lot of them just left. Perhaps not immediately but within a few years lots of Catholics were saying to themselves things like, "If the Church is suppose to be One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic why are they changing everything? If they are changing everything then maybe my Protestant friends are right."
I've heard this sentiment expressed by several of my friends who were Catholic, then left, and one who has come back (thank the Lord). She came back becasue she found a Catholic Church that does the Novus Ordo in Latin and has a very good Liturgy complete with Gregorian Chant.
I also have talked to Roman Catholics who told of "taking a break" and then coming back to the Church only to find out that it was gone. These individuals would certainly be more affected by these changes than would those who never left. Given the fact that "youthful wandering" is pretty common, it would seem reasonable to postulate that wholesale changes in matters of liturgics and practical piety hurt the Catholic Church.
It would also make sense that those who followed along in a missal with translation would see the changes -- whether they would care is another issue. Again, the approach in Roman Catholicism is different, since the view of authority is different, so it wouldn't surprise me that many would indeed accept the changes without complaint, as long as they were there every Sunday to be "brought along" and "re-educated."
My son is a string player, and he has played a few "gigs" the last couple of years at some large churches in our city. It was his impression, just from his liturgical experience, that Lutherans (who are pretty low-church around here) were closer to the Orthodox Church than are Catholics... That was certainly not the case when I was growing up!
My point there is that if relatively unsophisticated cradle Catholics returned to their church after a long absence, and didn't see much different between it and neighboring Protestant churches, it shouldn't be surprising if some felt free to choose something else from the available palette of ecclesiastical colors...
Anyway, to circle around to the topic of the thread, none of these things are Michael Davies' fault...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.