I win.
Now, sit.
If that's what you think, you're more deluded than I thought. As for the personal attack, you are the one who called my character into question for having a different opinion than you.
As for sources, it is not about sources or individual facts. It's about interpretation of the facts. That's the whole problem with debating this subject. No matter which so-called "fact" anyone brings to the table, it is subject to personal interpretation. The debate is pointless and I am not going to waste time going through it all again with you (a statement you will no doubt claim as some kind of victory when you send me your next reply--but that's ok. You go ahead and tell yourself whatever you need to.)