During our research we found that Madeleine Albright, daughter of Josef Korbel, used to be a senior fellow in Soviet and Eastern European Affairs at the Center for Strategic and International Studies conducting research in developments and trends in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. This think tank is connected to the U.S. Government. We also found that Madeleine Albright's cousin, Ms. Dagmar Deimlova-Simova, worked for the Czechoslovak communist press agency CTK. This is obviously a sensitive position in the communist system. Can you explain why the communists trusted and tolerated Deimlova-Simova when a member of her family worked for anti-communist think tanks in a leading capitalist country?
An essential part of this saga involves the claim that Josef Korbel allegedly stole property that belonged to the family of a German industrialist named Carl Nebrich. [HM note: The Nebrich family didn't want anything to do with the Nazis. Consequently, the Nazis confiscated Nebrich's mansion in Prague, but not the property inside the mansion, which was later allegedly "taken" by Josef Korbel and brought by him to the United States. See also http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/99/03/STimes290399b.html and http://www.jewishsf.com/bk990507/ilondonjta.shtml and about the lawsuit read http://www.sudeten.de/sites./a52.htm.] After the Nebrich family asked for the return of their property, the Nebrich claim was rejected. It seems that Madeleine Albright never intended to return the alleged stolen property. I am certain that even if Korbel could not be blackmailed before World War Two by the communists, a story like this would have caught the attention of the KGB and GRU after the war. They would then have very substantial compromising data on Korbel that could cost him many years in prison. In this position the communists had the upper hand on Korbel and could've done to him and with him whatever they wanted. Therefore it is not at all surprising that Korbel's daughter, Madeleine Albright, had such a prominent political career in American policy think tanks, like the Soviet section of the American Institute for Strategic studies. And it should surprise no one that she later became U.S. Secretary of State.
Regarding that absolutely essential fact about Madeleine Albright's cousin, Ms. Dagmar Simova-Deimlova, who possibly worked directly for the foreign section of the Czechoslovak communist press agency CTK, and because she used to live with the Korbels in London during World War Two and learned English very well, there's simply no case of a returned immigrant during the entire 42 years of communist dictatorship in Czechoslovakia that would be able to hold such a prominent position in the foreign section of the communist propaganda press agency. The only exception would be made for communist agents. They have the door always open to all high places of political influence and power.
Because Madeleine Albright's cousin, Ms. Simova-Deimlova, worked for the CTK without any problems and also at the same time as Madeleine Albright was rising in her political career in the United States higher and higher, this scenario is totally impossible under normal circumstances. Therefore this fact is compromising and incriminating for Madeleine Albright and her father Josef Korbel, alias Josef Koerbl, and suggests that they were possibly sent out to foreign countries, namely the United States, as communist agents. I cannot imagine any other possible explanation of this.
According to my sources, Josef Korbel was also mentor to the present National Security advisor of President Bush, Condoleezza Rice. Korbel persuaded Rice to go into political science instead of studying music at the University of Denver. In view of this, it is alarming that Condoleezza Rice is against any punishment of Russia even though Russia is playing an important role in supporting global terrorism with weapons and intelligence. It is also alarming since Russia strongly opposed the war in Iraq and secretly supplied Iraq with weapons and assistance. How do you explain Condoleezza Rice's position and the impact of her "wrong advice" to the president? Because I suspect that Josef Korbel worked for Moscow during World War Two, we should analyze every action of Condoleezza's Rice much more thoroughly. I think that Condoleezza Rice either doesn't understand or doesn't want to understand communist strategy. For this and other reasons she should not be allowed to serve as the national security advisor to President Bush. Moscow in fact cannot ask for a "better" advisor to the president. I'm very deeply convinced, after studying Soviet and Russian politics for over 30 years, that Condoleezza Rice's analyses are totally wrong and they in fact constitute a great danger to American national security. I don't want to speculate about the true reason why she's wrong, or if she's doing it on purpose, but she obviously doesn't understand the everlasting unchanged communist strategy of conquering the world.
There are those who have speculated, even asserted, that Bill Clinton is a communist agent recruited by the Czech secret services in January 1970. Could this explain why Clinton and his wife acquired and kept, for a considerable period of time, the FBI files on Republican politicians in the U.S. Congress, and could this be considered as an important intelligence operation in favor of communism?
To have compromising data about key politicians is the easiest way to dominate a country. Nobody will ever take notice. We know that Russia is organizing, directing and running a worldwide front against America. As usual, Russia keeps her hands hidden in this anti-American quest so she might receive more American financial help and pretend that she is still America's "strategic partner." Russia, in order to follow her strategy of deception and subversion, has many influential cadres, so-called "agents of influence" inside America's decision and policy-making centers; inside the media, academia, leftwing think tanks and various left-liberal organizations. Collecting intelligence information and compromising data on various politicians and prospective politicians is one of the most important elements of the communist strategy directed against the Free World. Compromised politicians are easily blackmailed and recruited by the communist intelligence services.
Supposing Bill Clinton is an agent of the communists. What do we make of the fact that Bill Clinton refused the extradition of Osama bin Laden from Sudan in the 90s? Can we, in light of this fact, speculate that Osama bin Laden is directed by Moscow to attack the United States? I'm personally convinced that Clinton is a communist agent as well as his vice-president, Al Gore, and therefore in that case to let Osama bin Laden go free would correspond with the communist interest in using bin Laden's "services" in the future. In mid-1992 Senator Alfonso D'Amato (R-NY) went to Prague to investigate Bill Clinton's "tourist visit" to Czechoslovakia after Clinton left the Soviet Union in January 1970. D'Amato's investigation did not produce any positive results because the Czechoslovak Government has had no intention of producing any such information about Clinton. And Moscow wouldn't be too happy about that.
Diky Honzo!