Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Limbaugh's Secret Life
GOPUSA ^ | 10/06/2003 | Carol Devine-Molin

Posted on 10/07/2003 5:37:58 AM PDT by jimmccleod

Limbaugh's Secret Life By Carol Devine-Molin October 6, 2003

We conservatives are all saddened by the news that Rush Limbaugh is being investigated by law enforcement authorities for illegal buys of prescription painkillers. If accounts being bandied about the media are accurate, then Limbaugh: a) has procured tremendous amounts of highly addictive narcotic medications from his pill-pushing housekeeper Wilma Cline, and, b) is likely to be subjected to arrest. Oh, by the way, dear Wilma sold her hot celebrity story to The National Enquirer for about four hundred thousand dollars. Am I surprised by the overall situation? Yes and no.

Given Limbaugh's outstanding analytical mind and sharp wit, it's difficult to believe that he's constantly in a drug induced state. Who is more articulate and funny than Limbaugh in the world of political commentary? Nobody. However, the hard truth is this: Among entertainers, media personalities and politicos, substance abuse exists in epidemic proportions. For that reason, many conservatives have quickly moved beyond denial and are prepared to hear the worst of it. And I think the majority of conservatives will continue to be compassionate and supportive toward El Rushbo as long as he embraces rehabilitative efforts.

Limbaugh is clearly the most influential conservative of our era, with a radio audience of up to thirty million listeners each week. He's probably converted more Americans to the conservative persuasion than any individual except Ronald Reagan. Understandably, Limbaugh's myriad political foes rejoice in his current troubles. Al Franken and the radical Left are ecstatic. If the tabloid piece largely pans out, Limbaugh has provided his enemies with significant ammunition in efforts to discredit and silence him. But will those hostile to Limbaugh ultimately succeed in ruining him? I doubt it. His current woes are definitely a setback, but not insurmountable. I would state one pivotal caveat. The only individual who can really bring down Limbaugh is Limbaugh himself. Conservatives will maintain solidarity with Limbaugh if, and only if, he dedicates himself to being clean and sober. However, if Limbaugh continues to dabble in drugs, his legion of fans and listeners will slowly drift away.

Although most people are focused upon Limbaugh's legal circumstances, much more is at stake. Drug addiction is a life-threatening condition, which requires proper intervention. Reports indicate that Limbaugh had been rapidly detoxed twice, but returned to drugs both times. Of course he has to undergo another detoxification, and not of the dubious "ultra-rapid" variety that is completed in 24 hours. But what about follow-up care? I'm referring to a program of drug treatment to prevent relapse. Importantly, with relapse there's always the specter of overdose and further physical deterioration. And Limbaugh will have to fight his addictive inclinations for the rest of his life - that is the nature of the beast. It's encouraging to note that many radio and television personalities, such as Don Imus and Larry Kudlow, are succeeding in their day-by-day recovery efforts.

The drugs taken by Limbaugh - OxyContin, Lorcet and Hydrocone - are terribly dangerous by all accounts. Never mind that they cause a host of emotional side effects including paranoia and mood swings. Now, it's coming to light that at least two of these powerful painkillers are linked to sudden hearing loss. In other words, it's conceivable that Limbaugh's deafness was caused by his own addictive behaviors. If that turns out to be the case, it's not only tragic but speaks to the incredible grip of dependency created by these drugs. On some level Rush Limbaugh, like all substance abusers, has self-destructive tendencies. That's his private business, and his responsibility to explore through counseling. For addicts, arrest is often a good thing since the Court system forces them into essential treatment. Roy Black is a very adept criminal attorney who understands these issues. If Limbaugh is charged with a crime, certainly mandatory drug rehabilitation would be part of the plea bargain. I doubt that Limbaugh would be made to serve any jail time.

As to The National Enquirer article, I read it. And I found it to be credible, rife with details that demonstrate the severity of Limbaugh's substance abuse problem. Limbaugh had at least one other drug supplier besides Wilma Cline, referred to as his "FedEx" connection. Apparently OxyContin is Limbaugh's drug of choice. And law enforcement authorities are in possession of a couple of tapes, and a bunch of emails, that substantiate the claims made by Wilma Cline and her husband regarding Limbaugh. The Cline couple cut themselves a very nice deal with the people at The National Enquirer that are experts at marketing


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: amocopharmacy; dennysparkinglotdr; drugs; eib; gopusa; limbaugh; maharushie; rush; rushlimbaugh; rushtojudgement
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 381-386 next last
Comment #61 Removed by Moderator

To: Walkin Man
LINK????
62 posted on 10/07/2003 6:28:14 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Alissa
What jumped out to me was her implication that his addiction was a FACT not an allegation from a tabloid!

Dittos.

63 posted on 10/07/2003 6:28:31 AM PDT by Alia (California -- It's Groovy! Baby!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jimmccleod
She mentioned drug rehab as part of a plea--but is he still addicted? He's already been through detox twice. Would he have to go through another rehab if his addiction problem is in the past?
64 posted on 10/07/2003 6:30:26 AM PDT by MHT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonserae
Clinton was doing his thing WHILE on the taxpayer dime.
65 posted on 10/07/2003 6:30:29 AM PDT by Alia (California -- It's Groovy! Baby!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: sonserae
"I suppose you felt that way about Clinton as well?"

X42 was elected to the highest position in the land. Traditionally, an office that demands virtue and morality. When he failed at that it took millions of dollars in taxpayer money to try and remove him from office....all becuase he lied and would not tell the truth.

Rush is a political entertainer who claims he is a "paragon of virtue and morality", but in the end is just a celebrity. We haven't yet heard his side of the story. You can turn off the radio to get rid of him.
66 posted on 10/07/2003 6:31:05 AM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: G.Mason
And law enforcement authorities are in possession of a couple of tapes, and a bunch of emails, that substantiate the claims made by Wilma Cline and her husband regarding Limbaugh.

"And so if people are violating the law by doing drugs, they ought to be accused and they ought to be convicted and they ought to be sent up."
Rush Limbaugh

Good morning cultboy, did you defend Bill Clinton too?

67 posted on 10/07/2003 6:31:31 AM PDT by Walkin Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: sonserae
Clionton was elected. Limbaugh is an elective for anyone wanting his views. There is a huge difference
68 posted on 10/07/2003 6:33:06 AM PDT by oldironsides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Walkin Man
I think it is time for Rush to step down and give McClintock a shot at the 12-3 time slot.
69 posted on 10/07/2003 6:33:12 AM PDT by Bluntpoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: jimmccleod
Don't shoot the wounded. Just pretend he's Johnny Cash.

God bless you, Rush. Hang in there.

70 posted on 10/07/2003 6:34:17 AM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bluntpoint
Mega ditto's Bluntpoint, I agree! lol
71 posted on 10/07/2003 6:34:18 AM PDT by Walkin Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: oldironsides
Ofuscation by a public official: Bad

Ofuscation by a radio personality: Benign
72 posted on 10/07/2003 6:34:28 AM PDT by Bluntpoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: ventana
But are you a listener? I think it is laughable when those that do not listen and are not fans demand that he explain himself. He owes them NOTHING. He is not a public official, people are free to listen or not, as they choose.

A couple of other points I've been wanting to make:

1) Although they indeed may cause loss of appetite, I've never heard of anyone using narcotics (opiates) to loose weight.

2) Pain management is a tricky business. We, as a society, want people to be medicated satisfactorily for pain, but we never want anyone to become addicted. If Rush started using drugs, I'm sure they were indicated and prescribed.
73 posted on 10/07/2003 6:35:45 AM PDT by johnb838 (sarcasm tags are for wimps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Walkin Man
"Good morning cultboy, did you defend Bill Clinton too?"

Touche!

That all depends on what the words "Bill Clinton" mean.

As I would do for any lady, you get the last word.

Remember, while you're babbling to me you are unable to get your well thought out ideas to the masses

74 posted on 10/07/2003 6:36:13 AM PDT by G.Mason (Lessons of life need not be fatal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: sonserae
Did someone elect Rush president? Was he taking advantage of a intern entrusted to his care?
75 posted on 10/07/2003 6:36:49 AM PDT by WHBates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24
I have yet to hear how someone can take, on average, 66 oxycodone pills per day for over a year. I talked to a pharmacist. He said there was NO WAY that he could even function, if he managed to survive that many drugs.

I have known people who got hooked on prescription pain killers over the years. One thing that most of them had in common was wanting to maintain their supply. Someone who is buying an average of 66 pills a day is not necessarily taking that many every day, but is likely building up a stash so that they don't have to make as many purchases. Time will tell as to whether or not any of this is true.

76 posted on 10/07/2003 6:37:57 AM PDT by Orangedog (Soccer-Moms are the biggest threat to your freedoms and the republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Lockbar
For years he would label anyone who called, a nut or a kook, if they believed in a conspiracy of anykind, usually one that the elite media disregarded. If this is true about Rush and there was cooperation among operatives to make deals with Rush, will he now believe in the concept of a conspiracy? He only disregards the sort of conspiracy that seeks to damage the common people. If the elite are immune, conspiracies do not exist.
77 posted on 10/07/2003 6:37:58 AM PDT by Final Authority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jimmccleod
".....I think the majority of conservatives will continue to be compassionate and supportive toward El Rushbo as long as he embraces rehabilitative efforts. ....."
78 posted on 10/07/2003 6:38:49 AM PDT by DoctorMichael (Thats my story, and I'm sticking to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool
I think all that wishful thinking is not very wise at this point. We need to have the courage to think that we are all capable of doing something stupid and power and money corrupt people. The proof of Rush drug addiction/usage is very clear, his hearing loss! My doctor friend has mentioned that to me before I read this article. My doctor friend does not listen to Rush, or knows that Rush had a hearing loss.

William Bennett never gambled either-heh? I do not worship or hold to high esteem ANY human. I respect and admire great people, but I know, that they are just like me, capable of making STUPID MISTAKES.

79 posted on 10/07/2003 6:39:28 AM PDT by philosofy123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: uncbob
And Rush was in the fore front in justifying the WOD and deprecating those who want it ended because of the loss of our civil liberties.

That's the part the pisses me off the most, should the allegations be true.

80 posted on 10/07/2003 6:40:19 AM PDT by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 381-386 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson