To: Cboldt
The situation is even worse IF a non-punch is equivalent to a NO. IN that case, the NO point of view would have an inherent advantage.
It isn't, it's just an undervote, like any other.
|
753 posted on
10/07/2003 12:52:18 PM PDT by
Sabertooth
(No Drivers' Licences for Illegal Aliens. Petition SB60. http://www.saveourlicense.com/n_home.htm)
To: Sabertooth
It isn't, it's just an undervote, like any other. That appears to be the majority sentiment here. If neither YES nor NO is punched, there is theoretically no voter for that question, even though the same person may be a voter for Q2 and/or 53 & 54. The law says a majority of voters must vote YES for recall to succeed, and my question is basically what constitutes a voter for that purpose. You are saying teh person is a voter on Q1 only if either YES or NO is punched, otherwise, the person is not a voter for Q1. The contest is betwen YES chads and NO chads, not between YES chads and total ballots.
757 posted on
10/07/2003 12:55:38 PM PDT by
Cboldt
To: Sabertooth; All
This just in, desperate Democrats trying to recruit more voters:
CLICK ON PIC!
758 posted on
10/07/2003 12:55:38 PM PDT by
StriperSniper
(Rush is mainlining THERA-GESICĀ® ;-)
To: Sabertooth; Quilla
Exit polling:
RECALL: No - 57%, Yes - 43%
Bustamante - 33%
Schwarzenegger - 30%
McClintock - 17%
My source is my cousin's best friend's lover's mother-in-law. That's all I can say.
767 posted on
10/07/2003 12:59:03 PM PDT by
Coop
(God bless our troops!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson