[Sabertooth]

The situation is even worse IF a non-punch is equivalent to a NO. IN that case, the NO point of view would have an inherent advantage.

It isn't, it's just an undervote, like any other.

[Cboldt]

It isn't, it's just an undervote, like any other.

That appears to be the majority sentiment here. If neither YES nor NO is punched, there is theoretically no voter for that question, even though the same person may be a voter for Q2 and/or 53 & 54. The law says a majority of voters must vote YES for recall to succeed, and my question is basically what constitutes a voter for that purpose. You are saying teh person is a voter on Q1 only if either YES or NO is punched, otherwise, the person is not a voter for Q1. The contest is betwen YES chads and NO chads, not between YES chads and total ballots.

[StriperSniper]

This just in, desperate Democrats trying to recruit more voters:

CLICK ON PIC!

[Coop]

Exit polling:

RECALL: No - 57%, Yes - 43%

Bustamante - 33%
Schwarzenegger - 30%
McClintock - 17%

My source is my cousin's best friend's lover's mother-in-law. That's all I can say.