Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: B Knotts
"Actually, while we can expect some legal moves from the RATS, it's a better situation in California because there are statewide recounting standards for all voting methods used."

In a close race, you could still see serious nastiness. A chad-chaff recount is possible in heavily Dem LA County, for example, but in more Republican areas, you have the "non-recountable" elecronic system with no paper trail.

So is the recall succeeds by slim margin, they could go "sweeping under the tables" for "lost" votes in heavily Dem areas only. When you sweep up in the candy facory, you get exree candy, when you sweep up in a barnyard you get something else, and it ain't more republican votes. So, if it's close, there is lots of room for more courtroom antics by the Dems.

328 posted on 10/07/2003 8:23:10 AM PDT by cookcounty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]


To: cookcounty
NASDAQ at 1900...Dashole on suicide watch....
329 posted on 10/07/2003 8:24:49 AM PDT by spokeshave (A vote for McClintock benefits Bustamante/Davis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies ]

To: B Knotts
Actually, while we can expect some legal moves from the RATS, it's a better situation in California because there are statewide recounting standards for all voting methods used.

I thought the electronic system leaves no paper trail and recounting is all but impossible.

Fox announcing that turnout is extremely heavy and may closely parallel 72% participation during the Presidential election. Hopefully it bodes poorly for Grayout and his phony wife.

381 posted on 10/07/2003 9:20:59 AM PDT by StarFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson