Replies

Wholeheartedly agree with you and unfortunately the administration has strong opposition--like the democrats, the United Nations --if by going into Iraq, who probably the US knew would be an easy country totake over, we could not get UN and the democrats on board, how are we to go military and invade CHina or other countries? The battle is one step at a time and you go after the smaller countries and slowly work your way up. President Bush never said this was the only battle in the war against terrorism. It is to be a slow and tedious process.

Imagine if President BUsh loses and Dean or Clark or Hillary make it to the WHite House. This battle against the bigger rogue nations will come to a screeching halt. Whining and name calling or vehemently disagreeing with the president just adds ammunition and fuels the fire of dissent. This upcoming election is so critical and even here in the free republic those of us who argue and namecall are just adding to the hysteria.

We seem to think that President BUsh is the enemy and his whole administration is no good. That is quite the contrary and I will continue to defend the president b/c he is the best we have--

The attackers (I must admit you were one of them) of the president do no good b/c that further divides the cause that we so much need to win. We are doing so much more than Clinton ever did and it angers me to see that our own country betrays us with the slime ball democrats attacking the president and arguing about the WMD.

Your reasoning is sound up to a point. I have one question. How do you influence the President and his party to stick to the conservative view that most grassroots Republicans have without criticizing his actions when he starts straying to the left? His people check forums such as this and if there is no protest, the easiest course of action is to continue left. I want the Republican conservative viewpoint to rule this next election. I don't want the Dick Morris triangulation strategy to make our party into the me-too party.