Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: secretagent
We have zero WMD to show for the invasion.

So?

We did not need them (WMDs) as far as I am concerned. Saddam had violated over and over again terms and conditions that brought Desert Storm to an end and as I understand it we had unilateral provisions in those agreements to act.

Now we have.

The WMD program was clearly advanced and continuing even if they had produced no weapons and it was good icing to put a halt to it. But that did not have to be the justification and I never looked at it that way and wish this administration had not set it forth that way.

Just my own opinion and views on the matter.

55 posted on 10/04/2003 9:02:44 PM PDT by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: Jeff Head
Hey Jeff! just bumping so I can find this weapon of mass information later.
56 posted on 10/04/2003 9:47:12 PM PDT by Big Giant Head (Landslide in '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head
I also wish the Administration didn't go to the UN without knowing they had the votes.

Sorta like "Don't ask a question you don't know the answer to" - standard lawyer strategy.

57 posted on 10/04/2003 9:56:18 PM PDT by secretagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson