Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GOPcapitalist
Probably. Another common tactic of Gen. Milroy was to hang civilians with a slip knot on doorframes. He would let them struggle in agony while ordering his soldiers to give tugs on their legs and make the death more painful. There was also a case where one of the yankee leaders and his band mutilated and tortured a suspected confederate. Perhaps the most blatant is documented in Milroy's own military orders. It is a 50+ person murder list that instructs soldiers to track down southern civilians for execution and list the bizarre and cruel manners in which those executions are to be carried out. One of them orders the men to stage an "accidental shooting" of the mother of a confederate soldier while they were supposedly searching her house. Another orders them to take some civilians prisoner and hand them over to a local unionist informant who would then be permitted to torture them to death. It was apparently the unionists' "reward" for spying on his neighbors

Certainly. Of course, it all began with the Confederate invasion of Tennessee ang the holding of the 'revised' secession vote under armed guard. Following that was the initiation of these sorts of brutal guerilla warfare tactics by the bastard scum slavers. By the time Milroy got there, it was just a matter of returning the faover, and the areas were particularly lawless. That's what comes of have a largely ignorant and illiterate population. Literacy rates in Tennessee didn't exceed 50% until after Roosevelt and government investment in the TVA pumped vast sums into the backwards and poverty stricker region. In fact, your woebegone ancestors probably didn't have a metal spoon in the house, and probably didn't have much of an understanding of the fact that he deserted the southern Army three times.

983 posted on 10/11/2003 9:53:22 AM PDT by Held_to_Ransom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 975 | View Replies ]


To: Held_to_Ransom
Of course, it all began with the Confederate invasion of Tennessee ang the holding of the 'revised' secession vote under armed guard.

No invasion. Tennessee's properly elected legislature decided to secede and called the referendum. Nor was there a previous secession vote to "revise" as you dishonestly suggest. The only previous referendum was on whether or not to call a convention on the matter of secession. Tennessee voted against it basically as the state split into three regions. The west was adamantly pro-secession from the start and remained so through both elections. Some counties there were even so strong on it that they demanded the ability to secede from Tennessee and join Alabama or Mississippi if the legislature would not act. The east was anti-secession and remained so through both elections (they voted against it in the secession referendum despite your unsubstantiated claims about armed guards forcing them to do otherwise). The swing area was in middle Tennessee, which was marginally against secession at the convention vote but had shifted its opinion in favor of secession after Fort Sumter. The referendum passed due to that shift in opinion, not some armed guard making everybody vote for it.

Following that was the initiation of these sorts of brutal guerilla warfare tactics by the bastard scum slavers.

Quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur. While comparatively little evidence exists of confederate brutality prior to Milroy's arrival, acts of mass murder and torture by yankee-commissioned guerillas in Tennessee extend throughout the war. The most notorious was yankee Col. Fielding Hurst. He operated from August 1862 through the end of the war, committing vile brutalities throughout. In mid-1863 Hurst's band of thugs captured some confederate POW's, proceded to hack off their heads, and placed them on stakes as mile markers along a road. These and other actions prompted some of Hurst's superiors to urge that he be penalized but the yankee command instead gave him a roving commission to continue his operations that December. Hurst kicked off the new year by having his men capture a physically handicapped child and beat him to death. A few weeks later they executed some more POW's and displayed the corpses in public for a week, allowing them to rot and denying burial. Executions of this sort continued every couple of weeks for the remainder of the year and often involved the prisoners being removed in the middle of the night and their brutalized bodies being discovered the next morning in the woods. In the spring of 1864 his men captured a confederate Lieutenant who was home on furlough. They dragged him from his home in the middle of the night, took him into the woods for torture, skinned his face while he was alive, shot him, and mutlilated the body. This was common for his victims. He often cut out their tongues, eyes, and genitals while they were still alive and then ended it with a shot to the head. At one point Forrest even sent a letter to the yankee command demanding the surrender of Hurst and his men to be prosecuted for their war crimes. The yankees refused and claimed that Hurst had been acting properly.

By the time Milroy got there, it was just a matter of returning the faover

No he wasn't. He was simply continuing what Hurst had started three years earlier. Hurst resigned his commission for health reasons in December 1864, just after Milroy arrived. Milroy's death lists were in circulation by January and continued for the next several months.

In fact, your woebegone ancestors probably didn't have a metal spoon in the house

False. Milroy's death list specifically ordered the yankees to steal all the spoons, as well as other furniture, from his house. They all include detailed lists of valuables to loot for each house. Mine also apparently had a lot of guns because the note next to his name specifically directs the yankees to confiscate those as well.

985 posted on 10/11/2003 10:30:42 AM PDT by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 983 | View Replies ]

To: Held_to_Ransom
Literacy rates in Tennessee didn't exceed 50% until after Roosevelt and government investment in the TVA pumped vast sums into the backwards and poverty stricker region.

Though illiteracy was a problem in Tennessee this was generally true of the poor anywhere in the 19th century. But that itself is misleading as even the most remote counties had surprisingly well educated persons there. This was generally true of the local clergy and circuit preachers, who learned to read the Bible in their divinity schooling. It was also true within the populations themselves. Read the secession resolutions that some of the Tennessee counties passed in early 1861 and read the records of their meetings. Far from being the procedings of clueless illiterates, they are eloquently composed arguments for joining the confederacy. You can literally dig up resolutions from the most backwoods farm county of western tennessee and find them quoting Shakespeare.

986 posted on 10/11/2003 10:37:54 AM PDT by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 983 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson