Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: warchild9
Well, Southerners evidently felt that a person's lack of citizenship, I mean being a slave, could be defended at gunpoint. So why not the acquisition or maintenance of citizenship?
26 posted on 09/30/2003 1:38:27 PM PDT by republicanwizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: republicanwizard
Arguing about slavery is a red herring, as irrelevant as arguments about Lincoln's sexual preferences.
An appropriate contemporary argument would concern the meaning of citizenship, and whether politicians, for whatever reason, have a right to maintain their power over others using force, and whether the Constitution as a contract concedes adherence to the Union under threat of death.
40 posted on 09/30/2003 1:48:32 PM PDT by warchild9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: republicanwizard
Well, maybe they were better off than they were in Africa....but of course a enlightened Neo-Yank like yourself wouldn't consider that possibility.
66 posted on 09/30/2003 1:58:13 PM PDT by TexConfederate1861 (Dixie and Texas Forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson