Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Chancellor Palpatine
Didn't they kill GM cars for a time about 72 or 73? The death of the muscle car.
209 posted on 09/30/2003 7:23:10 PM PDT by wardaddy (The Lizard King it was.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]


To: wardaddy; billbears; archy
Lets face it - car designers sucked from about 76 to 85.

Thats when you get the following:

Cheap vinyl dashes that split and start that sticky chemical breakdown after 2 years.

Cheap thin vinyl and/or velour seats that wear out split in 3 years.

Cheap feeling and chintzy looking knobs and switches with that fake silver crap that started chipping after a year, if it hadn't fallen off already.

Lousy regulating computers that were grotesquely expensive to replace - which happened too frequently.

Using that same cheap silver crap to cover exterior plastic decoration, none of which could take a good washing.

Can anybody forget that feeling of the power of accelerating from 0-40 in 18.7 seconds?

Sterring that was excessively tight - where a slight twist would swerve the car excessively. I suppose that was supposed to make the car appear "responsive".

Engines that were impossibly crammed into compartments - and which so resembled something cobbled together by kids at a middle school science fair, you were afraid to touch anything for fear of wrecking the whole thing.

Catalytic converters that reeked.

All these features were finally rolled into one model by Chrysler, infamous maker of the K car.....

241 posted on 10/01/2003 6:17:04 AM PDT by Chancellor Palpatine (....try weasel, the other yellow meat....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson