Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gianni
My timeline must be broken - it says the Southern states entered into an armistice and attempted to negotiate debt and land cession while it was in effect.

Your timeline must be imaginary. Just because the southern states had not yet initiated hostilities doesn't mean that an armistice was in effect. That kind of agreement exists only between sovereign nations. The southern states launched their rebellion, seized federal property, fired on shipf flying the U.S. flag and you want us to believe that they were serious about negotiating a fair settlement?

1,622 posted on 10/29/2003 1:53:32 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1606 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
Just because the southern states had not yet initiated hostilities doesn't mean that an armistice was in effect.

So which armistice is it that Lincoln's cabinet kept insisting he was violating?

1,638 posted on 10/29/2003 10:54:12 AM PST by Gianni
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1622 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson