[mattdono]

Yeah, whatever. I have had plenty of replies. You, on the other hand, can't respond (with any legitimate source) that contradicts the known facts. Rather, you use cheap debate tactics to try to make rather weak points. I have tried to be civil also, but all you can do is throw insults.

I am still waiting for you to provide sources for your opinions. Up to this point, you have only been able to tear down other people (such as Mr. Novak). You still, not once, responded to the actual law in question, though I have posted a link to the law several times.

The points that you are making on this thread are about as funny as the posts that you made defending Wesley Clark, future time traveller.

</lugsoul>

[lugsoul]

It is not an opinion that she was covered. Novak and the White House admit it, but you won't. You are blindly parroting those who spin and skew facts beyond recognition.

[lugsoul]

You are spinning so fast you must be drilling by now.

Was she covered?

Did Wilson break that cover by introducing her as his wife?

Did an admin official tell Novak she was CIA?

Did insider Novak know this so-called "common knowledge" before an admin official told him?

Did the CIA tell Novak not to use her name?

The UNDISPUTED answers to these questions are, in order - yes, no, yes, no, yes. If you have any facts to DISPUTE those facts, post them. All you've posted so far is spin to try to get around these facts that you find inconvenient.