Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jocon307
"false in one, false in all". If he states one demonstrably untrue claim, why should we beleive that he beleives anything he says?

Do you apply this to religous teaching as well? There have been many demonstrably false claims made by religous authorities. They all get swept under the rug as "he was wrong, but we know better now."

7 posted on 09/28/2003 11:00:01 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: marktwain
I make no point on religious teaching. I merely point out that the atheist claims atheists are a majority, a statement which is untrue. I am only seeking to debunk his credibility.

It's obvious that most religious statements must be taken on faith, they are largely unprovable. I would also like to be able to spell believe correctly, at least once in a while. : )
8 posted on 09/28/2003 11:05:13 AM PDT by jocon307 (Moving to New Zealand soon (apologies to F. Zappa))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson