[Hank Kerchief]

"The truth of God's existence does not require one single athiest's belief."

The truth of Allah's existence does not require one single athiest's belief.

No one here is denying God, but please, define your God, then we can discuss if such a God is even possible or not.

Hank

[azhenfud]

"..define your God,"

No. He's given every definition necessary for those who desire to know Him. I am considering your use of "Allah" as a provocative attempt, since it isn't too dificult to visit my homepage and discern for yourself of which God I speak.

"...then we can discuss if such a God is even possible or not."

That's an issue I neither question nor a debate I care to engage in. You decide for yourself if such a God is even possible, and if so, we then may continue a discussion from that point.
Otherwise. Good day.

[JohnSmithee]

"No one here is denying God, but please, define your God, then we can discuss if such a God is even possible or not."

The Christian god is easily definable but this definition is often incomplete or is rejected by atheists and agnostics. The trouble is that the same kind of reasoning can be applied to many abstract terms that many of use all the time. Try rejecting abstraction and you will find that much of what we call knowledge would need to be rejected also. This is an old debate of the early twentieth century between the positivists and just about everyone else, and has never been settled.