To: ambrose
Thanks for your comment. That means, though, that Arnold has gone from 28% to 35% during the same period that Tom has gone from 14% to 17% or 18%; in other words, Arnold's 7% "surge" has been almost double that of Tom's 3-1/2 to 4%. Am I doing the math correctly?
362 posted on
09/28/2003 10:53:52 AM PDT by
alwaysconservative
("If you can't change your mind, are you sure you still have one?" Maxine)
To: alwaysconservative; ambrose
Sorry, that should have been 12% to 17 or 18% and 27 or 28% to 35%. Geez, with all the numbers floating around, it's hard to see exactly what is current! Anyway, Arnold's surge still is bigger than Tom's, which is what I was trying to point out.
363 posted on
09/28/2003 10:58:44 AM PDT by
alwaysconservative
("If you can't change your mind, are you sure you still have one?" Maxine)
To: alwaysconservative
Here's another way of looking at it:
Arnold goes from 28 - 35, a 25% rise
Tom Mc goes from 12 - 17, a 42% rise
that's in two or three weeks.
If that trend held true, then in another two or three weeks,
Arnold rises another 25% to 44% of the vote
Tom Mc rises another 42% to 24% of the vote
364 posted on
09/28/2003 11:02:19 AM PDT by
fqued
(They spend spend spend, then tax tax tax; and where are the jobs? gone gone gone)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson