"The solution may be this. " ...
I always enjoy your posts.
I am truly torn:
McC - Has the right ideas.
Arnold - has the potential to bypass the media and go to the people taking the legislative bodies to task. (al-la Reagan)
The primary problem is not the govenor - it is the legislature and entrenched, protected bureaucrats.
My mind says McC - my heart and logic says Arnold.
I would vote for McC for Senate if some kind of face saving deal could be worked out for him now.
Someone suggested thet Arnold appointing McC to head a commission to audit the State - I like that. And with Arnolds "star" power to support and drive it may be just what we need. Then he runs for Senate.
There is a historic opportunity here -I am but one vote - and the Internet is the great equalizer. (Colt .45 for those who are young and vague on history)
I live in Alameda County - one of 3 liberal counties of the 9 in the Bay Area - I like your thinking AIT - I wish I hadn't smoked all my "Cubans" (trip to the Bahamas a few years ago - and no they wern't counterfits) I would have gladely donated them to the "cigar session".
These guys need to talk - soon.
Flame proof underware on - let 'er rip.
Hello Bobibutu:
There is no way that Tom will run for Senate...he knows the State but is not fluent in Federal issues.
The Republican Elite may offer Tom the Senate seat, but beware of what the Republican Elite tell you, or in other words, protect your back.
The Republican Elite has sold their soul to Arnold, and will sell their collective souls to whichever candidate they think could beat Boxer and right now they claim McClintock is "unelectable"...so what will change?
DD