[FairOpinion]

"I think they would rather have Boxer win then get behind a Republican that upholds the published planks of the party. "

===

You guys are the ones who are working hard to get Bustamante elected, not us.

[Rabid Dog]

So, is the author right or not?

[SunStar]

You guys are the ones who are working hard to get Bustamante elected, not us.

That is such a f***ing smear...

We are working to elect a conservative to replace a liberal while you guys are working diligently, on a conservative forum, to discredit the conservative in the race and elect a Hollywood liberal!

[truthkeeper]

You guys are the ones who are working hard to get Bustamante elected, not us.

We just don't see it that way. We see that so-called "conservatives" are failing to support a fine conservative candidate, probably the last one we'll ever get a chance to vote for in this state, to elect a liberal movie star.

To say that we are working hard for Bustamante is unfair and frankly, warped.

BTW, this whole thing will soon be rerun in Pennsylvania. It will be interesting to see how that one pans out as well.

[sruleoflaw]

Fair Opinion: Again FOR THE FR WORLD TO SEE:

What is the difference between Arnold and Cruz on these issues?

--Proposition 54 (whose supporters were dubbed "right-wing crazies" by Arnold)

--The job-killing Family Leave Act

--Taxes (one says he'll raise them; the other refuses to promise he won't).

--Abortion on demand for all nine months

--Vouchers

--Homosexual domestic partnerships

--Gay Adoption

NO DIFFERENCE Arnold=Bustamante LITE. SUCK IT UP AND PLEASE TELL ME THE DIFFERENCES ON THESE ISSUES.