Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

For the GOP, it's More than a Recall
Lt. Col. Gil Ferguson, USMC (Ret.)

Posted on 09/26/2003 12:00:31 PM PDT by StoneColdGOP

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380381-392 next last
To: BillyBoy
Ain't that true.
341 posted on 09/27/2003 2:11:06 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan (A vote for McClintock is a vote for Kyle Reese...and a vote against Cruz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper
Now please...take my BUMP.

What does that mean?

342 posted on 09/27/2003 2:15:53 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (Damn the Schwarzegroupies! Full speed ahead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies]

To: StoneColdGOP
This election is more about the party itself; will we continue to be a party of principle, directed by the philosophy of Lincoln and Reagan or have we laid our principles aside?

Yeah, the Powers that Be said Lincoln could never win either...The Stupid Party Indeed.


343 posted on 09/27/2003 2:16:01 PM PDT by PeoplesRep_of_LA (That's pre-election bogus, Arnold Schwarzenegger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
Out of Arnold and McClintock, which candidates' opinions on the issues most closely resemble yours?

McClintock by a country mile.

But since a vote for him is a vote for Cruz, I'll go for Arnold.

BTW, Freepers agree with me 50-44.

(If your man can't win on FR, he can't win anywhere.)

344 posted on 09/27/2003 4:31:30 PM PDT by Republic If You Can Keep It
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
In the past most California Indian tribes lived in penury. With their casinos they became wealthy. Why don't you let the Indians spend their new riches as they wish. The GOP could have been their advocate, at least as well as the Democrats.
345 posted on 09/27/2003 5:53:46 PM PDT by born yesterday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: born yesterday
In other state they pay some taxes, in CA they pay nothing.

Don't you think it's fair for them to pay part of their windfall to the state, just as all the rest of us do?
346 posted on 09/27/2003 5:55:23 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: StoneColdGOP
As one who is quite familiar with the Lincoln Club of Orange County, they tend to support the most right wing candidate that they can find. It is true however, that their endorsing one Republican is unusual, but then this is an usual election.
347 posted on 09/27/2003 6:25:22 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Yes I dealt it: Call it mental flatulance.
348 posted on 09/27/2003 6:41:25 PM PDT by sully777 (ad absurdum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
Forgive me.
349 posted on 09/27/2003 6:42:10 PM PDT by sully777 (ad absurdum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies]

To: StoneColdGOP
BIG BUMP!!!
350 posted on 09/27/2003 6:42:24 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
Don't worry, it's good. It's a way of forcing the thread back up to the top of the "latest posts" screen with a comment, thus a "bump." Sometimes you will see "bttt," which does the same thing.
351 posted on 09/27/2003 7:35:11 PM PDT by truthkeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

To: TomasUSMC
Your post # 29, a great post.
352 posted on 09/27/2003 7:40:00 PM PDT by meanspirit77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: StoneColdGOP
You know what, I respect the Marines as a fighting force without peer, but for this guy to affix his rank and service branch to his name, just killed my interest in his piece. If he can't argue a position, then he should give up writing. and if he can argue a position, he should give up cheating, by using his USMC rank. I have no tolerance for academics who let themselves be introduced as having attended "the university" (Harvard) prior to giving a public lecture, and the same goes for soldiers and their rank.
353 posted on 09/27/2003 7:44:56 PM PDT by mrustow (no tag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy
Good God, that post is absolutely dead on. I can see you spend a lot of time reading these threads!
354 posted on 09/27/2003 7:46:18 PM PDT by truthkeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies]

To: StoneColdGOP
BUMP!
355 posted on 09/27/2003 9:42:02 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag
The second thing that is certain is that Mcclintock can't become governor if I don't vote for him. He's staying the course and so am I.

EXACTLY!!! If you don't for your man, your man won't win!

356 posted on 09/27/2003 9:45:01 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: milan
I have said this once and I will say it again: I wish McClintock could win. But he can't. If everyone sticks by their principles, fine. Enjoy Bustamante.

If everyone stuck by their pricnciples, would California be in this predicament?

357 posted on 09/27/2003 9:46:20 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BearArms
And in California, the conservatives are still very powerful within the party, as we saw in the 2002 primaries that produced the nomination of conservative Bill Simon over liberal Richard Riordan, who had been the early favorite.

Whistling past the graveyard. The truth is that if the "true conservatives" lose the governorship to an incumbent with a 30% approval rating twice in 2 years "true conservatives" will be lucky to be allowed to bus the tables at the next GOP convention.

358 posted on 09/27/2003 9:49:22 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag
re: #8

thanks, best post I've read in two weeks...
359 posted on 09/27/2003 9:57:25 PM PDT by christynsoldier (remember, a vote for Bubbanegger is a vote for the Kennedy clan...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy
To: RockefellerRepub

He also LIED when he said Arnie would back him for the Senate during McClintock's withdrawl and endorsement back on October 1st. ARNIE DID NOT SAY THAT. Arnie's actual words were "I think this man could be our next Senator" and the crowd roared. NOTHING IN THERE ABOUT ARNIE SAYING HE WOULD HELP HIM BE THE NEXT SENATOR. Once again, the McScumbag voters are distorting Arnold's views!!!!!!

13 posted on 03/18/2004 2:11 PM CDT by HeilAhnuld

LOL!!! *wiping tears* That has to be the funniest and TRUEST post I've ever read on FreeRepublic! Tom really is in the race of a lifetime, and rumored "conservatives" are abandoning him at every turn. And if Tom does the right thing? There really is no way that Arnold will endorse or help him in abid against Boxer. You watch. Some other milquetoast "Republican" will be Arnold's Golden Child. Someone who can pull down Federal funds for a California bailout.

360 posted on 09/27/2003 10:21:28 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380381-392 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson