To: sheltonmac
"Are you referring to the war in Iraq or the war on terror? Contrary to what you may think, they are not one in the same."
Clearly you are not dealing in the currency of reality.
217 posted on
09/28/2003 12:50:25 PM PDT by
ConservativeStandUP
(Ironic that those who decry interventionism in Iraq demand intervention in Saudi.)
To: ConservativeStandUP
Clearly you are not dealing in the currency of reality.
Apparently not. I guess must have been in a coma when Fox News reported that Iraq had attacked us on Sept. 11, 2001.
You certainly seem to be informed about what's going on in the world. Perhaps you can tell me why we didn't invade Saudi Arabia in response to 9/11, and why there seems to be a cover-up of key facts regarding Saudi involvement.
218 posted on
09/28/2003 1:39:44 PM PDT by
sheltonmac
(If having the U.S. enforce U.N. resolutions is not world government, what is?)
To: ConservativeStandUP
Even if the war in Iraq could be justified, what about the author's point? Saddam is no longer in power, the threat from Iraqi WMDs has been eliminated and the Iraqi people clearly don't want us there. Why can't we simply declare victory and bring the troops home? Do you perhaps agree with Bush's insistence on using U.S. troops in nation-building exercises (something he vehemently opposed during the 2000 campaign)?
219 posted on
09/28/2003 1:48:11 PM PDT by
sheltonmac
(If having the U.S. enforce U.N. resolutions is not world government, what is?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson