Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TomGuy
TomGuy wrote:

The Judge's problem with the list is that it gives preferential exemption to charitable (and political) organizations.

In this case, the Judge seems correct. Shades of the Campaign Finance Act and its preferential exemptions.

**************************************

The solution to that is to ban ALL of them! No more preferential treatment!

I will not give to a charity that calls me at home. Too many scams get run that way.

And politicians don't need to call me to support their ad campaigns so that they can sling mud.

i give to charities that I chose, and support candidates who respect me.

Tia

45 posted on 09/25/2003 4:38:50 PM PDT by tiamat ("Just a Bronze-Age Gal, Trapped in a Techno World!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: tiamat
Well said.
50 posted on 09/25/2003 4:40:17 PM PDT by Kimlee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: tiamat
What difference does preferential treatment have if I own my own phone? I prefer this person or group but not that one - big deal. I do that every time I sign up for anything. "Would you like to hear about additional products we sell?" No. "Would you like to receive automatic notification of updates?" Maybe. We make these choices all the time, why is the telephone exempt from preference?
80 posted on 09/25/2003 5:13:37 PM PDT by kcar (T)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: tiamat
The solution to that is to ban ALL of them! No more preferential treatment!

My guess is that Congress will do just that tomorrow, while grinding their molars down to the size of grape seeds, in order to save their political skins.

208 posted on 09/25/2003 8:08:40 PM PDT by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson