Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: elfman2
"CNN, CBS and telemarketers choose devices that enable their communications accross public property "

A company PBX is a private system. When you connect your phone to Bell South , it’s on a public system (or at least a Bell South system). You knew that when you connected it.

My phone is connected to a phone compnay of some unknown ownership to me. That ownership is irrelevant to my point. My point is that the phone company leases public land to send me phone transmissions AND that these phone transmissions are specifically segmented to me AND I don't want them. Public property is never so easily segmented as it is with specific phone messages that are segmented accross it on phone lines. Who else would have a better right to control such a thing?

Telemarketing is not “harassment”. It’s solicitation. You just find it annoying.

My argument doesn't need for it to reach the level of harrassment and BTW some telemarketing DOES reach that level as would be judged by "a resonable person" -- IMO.

342 posted on 09/26/2003 11:07:01 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies ]


To: FreeReign
"Who else would have a better right to control such a thing? "

The access point owners (phone company) that you sign up with. Also, it was you (I think) that brought up the claim that it was harassment.

I have a plumbing leak and an 11mo to take care of today. Got to go, good luck.

360 posted on 09/26/2003 11:43:15 AM PDT by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson