Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California recall: Does one man hold key? [McClintock]
Christian Science Monitor ^ | 9-25 | Christian Science Monitor

Posted on 09/25/2003 2:54:50 PM PDT by ambrose

The Christian Science Monitor - csmonitor.com

from the September 26, 2003 edition - http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0926/p01s03-uspo.html

California recall: Does one man hold key?

Tom McClintock, top GOP conservative, could tilt race for or against Arnold Schwarzenegger.

By Daniel B. Wood | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor

BURBANK, CALIF. - Republican candidate Tom McClintock laughs from deep in the belly when asked if he will be the "spoiler" in the great populist revolution/experiment/circus of California's gubernatorial recall election.

"My opponents say I'm the Ross Perot of this campaign, possibly siphoning off enough votes to hand the election to Democrats," he says, settling onto a shady park bench for an interview. "I say, 'Wait a minute.... Ross Perot was an idle millionaire, with no public-policy experience who one day on a whim entered the presidential race.' That sounds like another candidate in this race ... not me," he says, referring to muscleman/millionaire Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Once a mere asterisk in the con- fused calculus of California's 135-candidate recall election, Mr. McClintock has gradually emerged as the strong, third-place vote getter in polls - rising (at 14-to-18 points) while the two leaders - fellow Republican Schwarzenegger (26 points) and Democratic Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante (28 points) - tread water.

As the race enters its final stretch, McClintock's motives and acts are becoming paramount for two reasons. One, splitting the Republican vote, he could cost the party its best chance in a decade of high, statewide office. Two, his candidacy could drag down the success of the recall itself by forcing Republican partisans to reconsider driving Gov. Gray Davis from office because of fear that they could hand the office to a more liberal Democrat, Mr. Bustamante.

Ever since McClintock leaped from 4 percent voter support to double-digits about three weeks ago, the pressure has risen for him to stop offering himself as an alternative to Arnold Schwarzen-egger that could hand the election to Democrats. But as more voters get to know him, his poll numbers have continued to rise, while Schwarzenegger's are flat.

More conservative than Schwarzenegger on social issues - abortion, gay marriage, gun control - he is also far more experienced in fiscal matters, with California's sagging economy the No. 1 issue.

"He is by far the most studied and experienced of all the candidates in fiscal issues and how to implement public policy," says Jack Pitney, political scientist at Claremont McKenna College. "If the election were a college SAT test, McClintock would be the next governor hands down."

Even though he is widely acknowledged as the more knowledgeable, the more articulate, and the more detailed idea-man, 25-year government veteran McClintock does not have the millions of dollars of his chief Republican rival, nor his name recognition. Therein lies one of the chief ironies of the recall: Does he/should he/will he step aside to allow the neophyte challenger - and the Republican party - to gain its best chance of victory?

"He is a man who stands on his word and his principles while claiming time and again that he is in this to the last," says Doug Jeffe, a longtime California political consultant. "If he did get out, it would be totally uncharacteristic of him."

Now, with Schwarzenegger and Bustamante in a near dead heat, one leading Republican, Darrell Issa, the millionaire who bankrolled the signature gathering to oust Davis, has said that if Schwarzenegger or McClintock don't back off, Republicans should vote "no" on the recall. Polls show that if Arnold backed out, McClintock could not win.

But McClintock rejects a widespread analysis that conservative candidates have brought Republican fortunes to their low ebb. He feels the current crisis is the perfect storm for their historic comeback.

"Great parties are built on great principles," says McClintock, referring to the pillars of conservative policy: holding down taxes, cutting waste, standing up for the unborn, and resisting government approval of gay unions. "This is not a time to change our principles."

While such comments win kudos from some for adherence to principle, they strike others as bullheaded.

"McClintock's constant megaphoning of conservative social agendas is presenting a real problem for Republicans who really like him for his fiscal experience," says William Schneider, a pollster and political analyst. "They know Tom has the smarts to get this state out of economic problems and they worry about Arnold's lack of experience and specificity. But they don't think Tom can win and can't resist the fact that Arnold could."

As a child, McClintock campaigned for Barry Goldwater at age 8. In high school he organized classmates into a statewide GOP group. A political-science graduate of UCLA, he became a syndicated columnist railing about former Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown, lauding the character of John Wayne. Hired by a former L.A. police chief-cum-state senator (Ed Davis), McClintock began a 25-year career in Sacramento, marked by opposition to Republican governors George Deukmejian and Pete Wilson over tax hikes and spending waste.

Despite his conservative stances, he was the top GOP vote-getter in the state, running for controller, in the 2002 election.

"I got very little from the state GOP and was outspent by my opponent by 5 to 1," says McClintock. "Despite all that, I lost by less than 1 percent of the vote."

A man who often quotes Reagan and Shakespeare, McClintock is considered a legislative loner with few legislative friends for his near two-decade pursuit of shrinking the state payroll.

In his favorite stump speech he tells why cutting is so important. As a child, he came home from school to find his mother crying over an unexpectedly high tax bill. The moment has lived in his imagination ever since that government takes too much from citizens and delivers too little.

Full HTML version of this story which may include photos, graphics, and related links


www.csmonitor.com | Copyright © 2003 The Christian Science Monitor. All rights reserved.
For permission to reprint/republish this article, please email copyright@csps.com



TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 501-517 next last
To: doodlelady
He scares me.

Me too. I really wonder if he is mentally stable.

181 posted on 09/25/2003 4:50:10 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (I'm voting for Arnold. McClintock doesn't deserve my vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: Tamsey
Errrr.... the CORRECT TITLE on that Ann Coulter column is... "The Most Important Reason to Vote for Arnold"

Wrong!! Go to the Official Ann Coulter website from which I copied and pasted the source of the article and you will see that the correct title for the article is "It Depends What The Meaning Of The Word 'Deficit' Is ". Click on the name name of the article and look for yourself.

182 posted on 09/25/2003 4:50:18 PM PDT by Spiff (Have you committed one random act of thoughtcrime today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: doodlelady
He scares me.

I guess he's the John Galt to your Jim Taggart. Sounds about right.

183 posted on 09/25/2003 4:50:18 PM PDT by NittanyLion (Go Tom Go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: doodlelady
Hey you, happy Thursday :-)

BTW, I'm jealous you heard the show... I would have liked to have caught it, too.
184 posted on 09/25/2003 4:51:01 PM PDT by Tamzee ("Big government sounds too much like sluggish socialism."......Arnold Schwarzenegger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000; BibChr; onyx; PhiKapMom; Tamsey; redlipstick; habs4ever; My2Cents; South40; ...
Posse Ping!! ...no more like Arnold’s Idiots And before you go running to Report Abuse... your only reason you ping these people is to disrupt this thread ... you have become out own little FR DU...so dont cry your being abused

So now you have a problem with ping lists??

185 posted on 09/25/2003 4:51:42 PM PDT by EggsAckley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
you wrote: You can argue all you want to that Arnold's baby steps rightward--the ones forced by Tom and his supporter's refusal to surrender to the liberals--mean anything. He has no credibility.

Please translate. . . I am not certain I have any idea what you are saying.

Oh, and I NEVER said that Arny was on the right, and I also never said that I supported him or his views. I was arguing for FAIRNESS about what he says and believes, and against calling him a liberal or RINO. He certainly ain't a conservative, but he also ain't no liberal, either.
186 posted on 09/25/2003 4:52:26 PM PDT by fqued (facts are nasty little things, but that doesn't mean we should squash them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: South40
"What are you in your early to mid-twenties? It shows..."

LOL- be sure to tell me when I have permission to "speak with experience". I have more at stake than many older people out there since I get to look a lot farther down the playing field. Not every play is made on the 10 yard line.
187 posted on 09/25/2003 4:52:29 PM PDT by ProtectorOfTwo (......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Ann Coulter and Sean Hannity are both great Arnold supporters

Ann is not a "great Arnold supporter". Any support she might offer the liberal is tepid, at best. The only reason she can come up with that anyone would want to vote for the liberal is that he "is not Gray Davis."

188 posted on 09/25/2003 4:52:54 PM PDT by Spiff (Have you committed one random act of thoughtcrime today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: buwaya
Liberal Republicans in liberal states - what sort of Republican could you elect in those places ? And with a liberal population, there is some surprise they voted for Gore, in such a close election ?

Nice circular logic. But but I thought that in close elections that a Governor's party magically made some difference in the way people vote? If anything, because of America's history in Congress of always voting for the party out of power, it HURTS the candidate.

Certainly nothing hurts a party like a dithering, pandering, principleless leader, which was the point.

(R)nold wins, Bush loses.

189 posted on 09/25/2003 4:53:10 PM PDT by PeoplesRep_of_LA (That's pre-election bogus, Arnold Schwarzenegger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
Do you worry that allowing a "fiscal conservative" who is a "social liberal" to win will make the GOP more likely to drop their anti-abortion and anti-gay platform?

Of course. Ultimately, that is what this is about, as you well know. That's why I'm in it, and why you are in it.

I want to keep the GOP the Reagan pro-life party, and you want to make it the Schwarzenegger pro-death RAT party two.

But I don't accept your premise that Arnold is 'socially liberal and fiscally conservative'. That particular creature is mythical.

190 posted on 09/25/2003 4:53:53 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Call upon God to move on our behalf...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley
No, they have a problem with folks disagreeing with them... stating opposing viewpoints is now considered "trashing a thread" in their eyes.

Sounds a lot like China to me...
191 posted on 09/25/2003 4:55:20 PM PDT by Tamzee ("Big government sounds too much like sluggish socialism."......Arnold Schwarzenegger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
So why doesn't she support McClintock?
192 posted on 09/25/2003 4:56:15 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (I'm voting for Arnold. McClintock doesn't deserve my vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
actually "communism" is at its core an economy theory of history. In practice it is totalitarian, atheistic socialism.

Nothing I wrote about is "communism."

The problem with using words like "communism" is that the emotion content is very high, and the communication content is very low, unless the words are use quite precisely.
193 posted on 09/25/2003 4:56:19 PM PDT by fqued (facts are nasty little things, but that doesn't mean we should squash them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
So why doesn't she support McClintock?

Who said she doesn't?

194 posted on 09/25/2003 4:57:11 PM PDT by Spiff (Have you committed one random act of thoughtcrime today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Tamsey
Don't know where THAT guy came from. I think they have a tag team.....ambrose was curiously silent most of the day, but tallhappy was double pitching. Why are they so caustic? I never said a word to him. Oh well, don't answer.

~</;o)
195 posted on 09/25/2003 4:57:44 PM PDT by EggsAckley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
You act like this is a sporting event. It isn't.

Please, I KNOW ITS IMPORTANT to the people of California and this nation, that's why I don't want to see Busty win via GOP stupidy, unlike others (hint).

196 posted on 09/25/2003 4:58:40 PM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
I want to keep the GOP the Reagan pro-life party

But didn't Reagan sign a bill in California alloowing abortion?

197 posted on 09/25/2003 5:00:43 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (I'm voting for Arnold. McClintock doesn't deserve my vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: fqued
If Arnold is not a liberal, then words no longer have meaning to you folks. You've become like this guy:


198 posted on 09/25/2003 5:01:00 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Call upon God to move on our behalf...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
Another Jim Taggart.

Ayn Rand was an amazing woman, to have the insight to understand folks like yourself. You're terrified of the man's unwavering principles because it's threatening to you.

199 posted on 09/25/2003 5:01:57 PM PDT by NittanyLion (Go Tom Go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley
Yes, the caustic aspect is really interesting... and started the night Arnold announced on Leno ;-)
200 posted on 09/25/2003 5:02:12 PM PDT by Tamzee ("Big government sounds too much like sluggish socialism."......Arnold Schwarzenegger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 501-517 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson