To: centurion316
But the Stryker will be deployed IN PLACE OF Bradley units. It won't be a decision wether to send light infantry into the theater, but wether to send a Stryker or a Bradley unit to accompany that light unit. Therefore, the comparison to the Bradley is warranted.
36 posted on
09/25/2003 1:08:50 PM PDT by
SJSAMPLE
To: SJSAMPLE
The Army claims Stryker is a personel carrier, not a fighting vehicle. Still, I betcha when we see that unit patroling in Iraq they won't be foot patrols.
37 posted on
09/25/2003 1:11:23 PM PDT by
colorado tanker
(USA - taking out the world's trash since 1776)
To: SJSAMPLE
Last time I checked, the cupboard was pretty bare of heavy units ready to deploy. When Stryker Brigade conversion is complete, the net result will be an Army that is heavier, more mobile (once deployed), and that possesses more firepower than before.
Comparisons are best done within the same class of vehicle and within the same doctrinal concept of employment. For example: M1A1 tank with Challeger; Saxon with Stryker; M2 Bradley with Warrior IFV. You get the picture.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson