Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lainie
I was hoping Arnold would show that he has a firm grasp of the miserable situation in California. Maybe he does, but he seemed to talk about "the children" way too much, as if he was another Democrat in the pocket of the education mafia, just like the rest of the scumbags. Pandering to the sucker moms and the illegals will only take you so far. And personally, I like candidates who also give a crap about former children, ie., taxpaying grownups.

On the other hand, who didn't pump their fist into the air when Tom McClintock looked straight into the camera and proudly recited clearly and specifially what he stands for: He is the only candidate to sign a "no tax increase" pledge; he is the only candidate who is pro-life; and he is the only candidate who stands firmly behind the entire Bill of Rights, "including the second amendment".

Wowza....!!!

McClintock won this debate in a walk, and you have to be completely blinded by an irrational desperation to "win" at any cost if you didn't see it. Whoever came in second wasn't close to McClintock.

Heck with governor of California - - let that place swirl away down the liberal toilet where the people have been voting it for years anyway - - I would like a President like McClintock. What a stunning performance.

2,564 posted on 09/24/2003 9:26:23 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lancey Howard
And you're the second person to whom I've offered this piece tonight. T.M. is the man.
2,614 posted on 09/24/2003 10:00:36 PM PDT by lainie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2564 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson