[HamiltonJay]

Ah yes the last refuge of the lost argument, claim your opponent isn't a true conservative, or some other name.

I am not sure what point you are trying to make with this statement, other than perhaps since Dole was obviously going to lose I must have voted Clinton because of it being obvious he would win? Which is a nonsense comparison.. because there is a huge difference from voting for your parties canidate even if they lose and voting for a canidate when you know it will cost your party completely the election.... But I know I know, political subtleties are lost on the all or nothing crowd.... Keep up the good work.... Californias been doing great with your mentality so far!

[Sloth]

...other than perhaps since Dole was obviously going to lose I must have voted Clinton because of it being obvious he would win?

Exactly. Clinton was the most conservative "electable" candidate in 1996.

Which is a nonsense comparison.. because there is a huge difference from voting for your parties canidate even if they lose and voting for a canidate when you know it will cost your party completely the election.... But I know I know, political subtleties are lost on the all or nothing crowd....

And the difference between "party" and "principle" is lost on political prostitutes.