Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: B Knotts
What would have been said here if nude photos of Clinton had surfaced? Seriously. Think about that.

This is so far-fetched that "I don't know" is the only answer I can muster.

The sole reason Arnold was approached to be in those photos is because he was a world-famous bodybuilder and was paid a nice sum of money for (what I understand to be) rather artsy, non-sexual images.

I suppose it would be worse for Clinton to have done it inasmuch as Clinton clearly DIDN'T have that aesthetic appeal, for, then, his doing so wouldn't have any non-weirdo rationale that I can fathom. (That is, if you weren't traditionally Adonis-like, and weren't being paid, why on Earth would you consent to a nude shoot that was destined for a national magazine? ... unless you "got off" on the idea ...??)
271 posted on 09/24/2003 11:35:52 AM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies ]


To: pogo101
If Clinton had taken nude photos, no matter the reason, the reaction here would have been nuclear. The double standard here is blatant.

I am gradually realizing that about 85% of the Schwarzenegger support is not much more than mindless star worship, and that there is absolutely nothing short of him being involved in some sort of murder-cannibalism scandal that will change the minds of most of his supporters.

277 posted on 09/24/2003 11:40:44 AM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson