Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FreeTheHostages
This is about 'free speech zones' and you know it.

If any group of protesters get violent or disorderly, arrest them. That however is NOT justification for prior restraint of protesters by designating them to a 'free speech zone' well ahead of any event.

It was wrong when Clinton did it, and it's just as wrong now.

Now to be fair the ACLU didn't care when Clinton did it, and now they seem to care. So we know the ACLU is a bunch of hypocrites, just like a bunch of FReepers.

Neither side cares about free speech. They only care if they can deny it to the other side. They're just wrestling over who wields unconstututional big government.

22 posted on 09/24/2003 8:28:22 AM PDT by freeeee (I may disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: freeeee
What is the maximum effective range of a homicide bomber? C4, liberally packed with ballbearings and a detonator is all you need to make a human claymore mine with a 50 meter casualty radius. Do you doubt for an instant that there aren't those on the extreme Left that aren't as crazy as Palestinian suicide bombers?

Love the quotes on your profile page. Is that you with the pistola?
25 posted on 09/24/2003 8:33:37 AM PDT by IGOTMINE (He needed killin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: freeeee
Read my post #15. I agree with you about protestors and free speech.

When I was active in the ACLU, the organization did a great deal of good and that book burning case I mentioned was a noble and ethical undertaking. But by 1983 the organization began to change and rapidly evolve into a communist front.

The Clintons moved quickly to take over the already corrupt ACLU when Bubba was molesting interns in the Oval Office. Today it is funded by the same people who give tons of donations to Hillary.

27 posted on 09/24/2003 8:40:38 AM PDT by ex-Texan (Read Sun Tzu: The Cold War Never Ended)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: freeeee
If any group of protesters get violent or disorderly, arrest them

Now there's an idea -- let them take a swipe at the President and arrest them later. I just thought that was such a *fantastic* idea that it deserved to be highlighted. Of course, the U.S. Constitution does not mandate such foolishness.
30 posted on 09/24/2003 8:50:52 AM PDT by FreeTheHostages
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: freeeee
"Now to be fair the ACLU didn't care when Clinton did it, and now they seem to care. So we know the ACLU is a bunch of hypocrites, just like a bunch of FReepers. "

"Now to be fair"! Don't mess up a perfect record by being fair.

168 posted on 09/24/2003 6:09:16 PM PDT by auggy (http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-DownhomeKY /// Check out My USA Photo album & Fat Files)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson