To: EggsAckley
Hm. I did a search.
The word "Bustamante" does not occur once.
That has to mean the author did not ask the only important question: "Is his policy worse than Bustamante's?"
Just another Arnold-bashing. A really wordy one.
Meanwhile, back in the Real World, where we have TWO choices, Bustamante or Schwarzenegger....
Dan
9 posted on
09/23/2003 2:06:46 PM PDT by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: BibChr
Just another Arnold-bashing. A really wordy one. If you think this is just bashing, I would like to see your rationale based upon a logical disputation of the evidence.
11 posted on
09/23/2003 2:09:03 PM PDT by
Carry_Okie
(The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by politics.)
To: BibChr
Did you ever possibly think that Carry is trying to give all sides of a story and ideas so that one could make a truely informed discernment of and to whom they will vote for?
To: BibChr
Not to be rude, but why don't you take the time to read the essay that leads the thread? You obviously have great zeal for Schwarzenegger, but does that excuse you from making an attempt to be informed about where he stands on vital issues?
57 posted on
09/23/2003 3:33:11 PM PDT by
JCEccles
To: BibChr; Carry_Okie
Hm. I did a search. The word "Bustamante" does not occur once. That has to mean the author did not ask the only important question: "Is his policy worse than Bustamante's?" Did the author do a similar environmental analysis of Bustamante? I think that's a valid question given the recall election that is about to occur.
IMO, the authors environmental analysis is excellent. His political analysis is not as clear-sighted.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson