Replies

Thanks for posting the html. I used to be able to read pdf. I'm not sure why I can't now.

Great letter:

"....There is a fine balance between Terri’s right to privacy and her right to life, which are co-equal in our constitutions. To err on one side is to prolong her existence, perhaps against her wishes. To err on the other is an irrevocable act that affords no remediation. While Terri may not be able to eat orally again, there is enough doubt as to her potential for that limited rehabilitation that to do otherwise deprives her of her life without due process. If the guardian and the courts refuse to entertain such an option, they are arbitrarily and capriciously depriving Terri of her constitutional right to life...."

My only concern now is that 'due process' part.