Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tom McClintock - The conscience of a conservative?
MensNewsDaily ^ | Sept. 19, 2003 | Bob Chandra

Posted on 09/19/2003 8:56:57 PM PDT by FairOpinion

In recent days, Tom McClintock, the "other Republican" in California's recall race, has accepted a million dollars spent on his behalf by a left-wing special interest group. He has claimed that a Democrat victory in the recall election would be desirable, as it would better his chances in 2006. And he has joined with Democrat Cruz Bustamante in a boycott against fellow Republican, Arnold Schwarzenegger. This is the man we're supposed to believe represents the conscience of conservatism? At the end of the day, Tom McClintock's Faustian Pact with the Left has made one thing clear - it's all about Tom McClintock.

The $1 million to be spent on McClintock's behalf is by Indian gambling interests, a staunch Democratic special interest. I wrote about the possibility of left-wing special interests backing McClintock in order to divide Republicans several weeks back. Now it is a reality. The Sacramento Bee has announced that the Morongo tribe is spending $1 million to boost McClintock's candidacy and it's not because they want him to win. The money spent on McClintock is meant to split the Republican vote so their loyal servant, Democrat Cruz Bustamante, can emerge the winner. With enough left- wing money, McClintock can steal enough votes from Arnold to make that happen. Tom's win-at-any-cost mindset has him collaborating with leftist groups who want nothing more than a divided Right to throw the election to Bustamante. Does McClintock see that the Left is using him? Maybe there's a reason it's called "blind" ambition.

McClintock's partnership with the liberal special interests raises serious questions about his loyalty to the GOP. McClintock has said he puts his personal "principles" before the party. But there's a deeper reason McClintock doesn't care that his spoiler candidacy will doom Republicans in the recall race.

In a conversation with US Congressman Dan Burton, Tom McClintock said the following: he (McClintock) didn't mind it if Democrats win the gubernatorial race because it could improve his own chances in 2006. According to the Los Angeles Times, "Burton, one of the more conservative members of Congress, also said McClintock had seemed to suggest that it would be acceptable for a Democrat to hold the governor's office, because he might create a clamor for a Republican in 2006.". So that's what this is really about. If McClintock can't win, he can at least prevent the Republicans from winning so he has a better shot in 2006. Aren't we glad he's playing for our team?

McClintock is now collaborating with Cruz Bustamante to boycott the California Broadcasters Association's debate on the 24th as a means of showing up Arnold Schwarzenegger. Bustamante led the boycott charge on October 17th with McClintock soon followed his lead. When you see a Republican siding with a Democrat against a fellow Republican, you know something is wrong with the picture. Don't adjust your set- this is Tom McClintock, the self-styled conscience of conservatism.

As if things couldn't get any worse, McClintock is justifying his candidacy on a poll strategically conducted by the left-wing Los Angeles Times, which wants nothing more than to keep him in the race. That Times' poll has been debunked by Field and even invalidated by the Times' own reporting. It added 6% more self-identified conservatives than other polls and naturally gave McClintock an artificial 5% bump. But McClintock is clinging to this cooked poll, another leftist ploy, because it serves his interests.

What kind of a conservative lets left-wing interests drive his candidacy like this? The answer is a candidate who is so blind with ambition that he does not see how the Left is using him to their own ends. Thus far, McClintock has claimed he stands for principle, but it is obvious that his hopeless candidacy is based on personal ambition. It's no longer appropriate to view McClintock as merely a misguided crusader. He is a bigger threat to Republican victory on Election Day than Cruz Bustamante. Up until now, McClintock has responded to arguments for stepping aside with denial, delusion, and arrogance. Given his collaboration with the Left, Republicans must get serious with him. McClintock's "stalking horse" candidacy must come to an end.


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: bustamante; california; contribution; indian; mcclintock; recall; schwarzenegger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-295 next last
To: Dave S
Your standard is fraudulently high, and you know it. Why don't you name the last controversial measure to be passed by such a small minority in any legislature, at any time during the history of the United States?

The only thing the GOP could do in the CA Senate was act as a bulwark against new taxes that required a 2/3 majority to pass. This they did... do you not appreciate that they consistently opposed new taxation?

Oh... I forgot. You're an (R)nold fan... so you don't mind taxation. D'oh!
261 posted on 09/20/2003 2:23:23 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Right Wing Crazy #5338526)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: Dave S
If that is true then it must say a lot about McClinton. Schwartzenneger has more than twice the number of Republicans planning to vote for him as McClinton.

Don't know anyone on the ballot named 'McClinton'.

But if you are derisively referring to Senator McClintock, I doubt your assertion greatly.

262 posted on 09/20/2003 2:26:26 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Right is right...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: Dave S
"Frankly, I think most Republicans think its about time for crosseyed Tom to figure out he is supposed to beat the Democrats and start campaigning against Bustamante and for the recall, two things he has been neglecting since he entered the race."
_________________________________________________________________

McClintock filed his candidacy on August 5, 2003. The very next day, the following appeared in the Ventura County Star:

    And with that, McClintock the candidate was off and running, talking about a California under his stewardship and why Gov. Gray Davis needs to be booted from office.

So, contrary to what you have claimed, McClintock did not "neglect" to campaign for Davis' recall "since he entered the race." He started campaigning for Davis' removal from office right from the start of his own candidacy back in early August.

In fact, he was campaigning for Davis' recall long before that.

Back in July, who showed up to deliver the most fiery speech at the huge Recall Davis Rally?

McClintock.

Who was MIA at that rally?

Schwarzenegger was... just as he was absent at the debate.
_______________________________________________________________

Dave S: "...and start campaigning... against Bustamante"

Since he entered the race, McClintock has repeatedly slammed Bustamante:

    McClintock Blasts Bustamante for Tax Increase Proposal (8/21/03)

And on September 11 McClintock made it crystal clear that Bustamante's defeat was the overriding goal:

    "My support would go to Arnold if it looks like Arnold's the only hope of stopping Cruz Bustamante, and I think Arnold's support would come to me if our momentum continues and they realize they can actually have their first choice and he can win," [said McClintock].


263 posted on 09/20/2003 2:31:36 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
But if you are derisively referring to Senator McClintock, I doubt your assertion greatly.

Doubt all you want but look at the breakout of poll results by political affiiation. Arnold has a much greater percentage of the Republican vote than Tom. In addition, he has a bigger share of the Independents than Tom has of the Republicans. He is close to having the same of the Dems.

Also in the straw poll at Republican convention Arnold got 82%. Where is your proof that McClinton could even win a Republican primary other than having a few zealots here on FR.

264 posted on 09/20/2003 2:34:59 PM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
Your standard is fraudulently high, and you know it. Why don't you name the last controversial measure to be passed by such a small minority in any legislature, at any time during the history of the United States?

You still havent addressed how McClinton would turn this financial mess around in California. You do understand as governor, he would be responsible for getting a budget approved? Why are we to believe that he can do now what he couldnt for twenty years? Guess that is why your candidate has switched from wanting to win and wanting the recall to pass, to just keeping the reigns of power from Arnold.

265 posted on 09/20/2003 2:38:15 PM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte
Since he entered the race, McClintock has repeatedly slammed Bustamante:

It doesn't how many times you prove that with articles and links; they'll resurrect their fraudulent talking point soon.

266 posted on 09/20/2003 2:46:08 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: Dave S
Also in the straw poll at Republican convention Arnold got 82%.

The convention didn't hold a straw poll. A couple of Arnold groupies claimed they asked people in a hallway.

267 posted on 09/20/2003 2:47:43 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: Dave S
Doubt all you want but look at the breakout of poll results by political affiiation. Arnold has a much greater percentage of the Republican vote than Tom.

Those poll numbers are already ancient in terms of a race like this. But in any case, you specifically said that AS had more than twice as many as Tom. I don't think that's the case. You'll have to back up that assertion.

In addition, he has a bigger share of the Independents than Tom has of the Republicans.

Not surprising early in a race like this when you consider the celebrity factor.

He is close to having the same of the Dems.

Arnold might give Cruz a run for his money with Dems. Not surprising either. IMO, Cruz is toast anyhow.

Also in the straw poll at Republican convention Arnold got 82%.

Quit using that; it's a phony argument. That supposed strawpoll has no validity whatsoever.

Where is your proof that McClinton could even win a Republican primary other than having a few zealots here on FR.

Why can't you call him by his name? Tom McClintock has about one in five voters in California right now, if you believe the polling at all. He has plenty of room for growth, considering the fact that he is the only one who has had a broad, substantial, issues-based attack against the current regime from the beginning, and because the issues he has pounded from the beginning are the very issues at the heart of the recall.

268 posted on 09/20/2003 2:50:35 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Right is right...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: Dave S
Any governor can ultimately force a legislative coalition with less than a 2/3 majority to capitulate on budget issues if he is able to publicly articulate his case better than the opposition. A State Senator doesn't have that power, and no conservative has had that power in California in quite some time, so it's disingenuous to blame the minority party for the failures of the majority party.

The part of the GOP that did fail was the party apparatus. Its dalliance with liberalism cost it the moral authority necessary to convince the electorate of the virtues of conservatism, and thus to gain a majority in the lawmaking body.

269 posted on 09/20/2003 2:55:45 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Right Wing Crazy #5338526)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
Any governor can ultimately force a legislative coalition with less than a 2/3 majority to capitulate on budget issues if he is able to publicly articulate his case better than the opposition.

Well lucky for you, Tom will never have to prove you right. He will never become governor of California.

270 posted on 09/20/2003 3:00:40 PM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Capitol Resource Institute (CRI), California’s leading pro-family organization, released today the results of a straw poll between candidates for Governor conducted at the California Republican Party’s convention in Los Angeles.

CRI conducted the only straw poll to be open on Friday and Saturday through the speeches by both of the major Republican candidates, giving an equal chance for their supporters to cast votes.

“While our poll obviously will not reflect the preferences of the voting population at large, we believe that it is a good snapshot of the feelings of the party activists” said Karen England, Program Director for Capitol Resource Institute.

Candidates Arianna Huffington, Peter Cameo, and even Cruz Bustamante received a handful of votes from the predominantly Republican visitors to the CRI booth. Arnold Schwarzenegger and Tom McClintock received almost identical numbers of votes.

“It should be noted that we encouraged anybody who passed by to stop and vote,” said England. “Even Democratic Party activist Bob Mulholland came by the booth. Unfortunately, we could not get him to cast a vote.”

The only limitation put on voters was that they had to obtain a CRI issued California Driver’s License, bearing the name “Elle Legal,” in an obvious criticism of Governor Davis’ recent signing of SB 60, a measure that would make it easier for illegal immigrants to obtain a driver’s license.

“While the vote was by secret ballot, both the McClintock and Schwarzenegger supporters were passionate in showing support for their respective candidates.”

The results of the poll conducted on Friday and Saturday are as follows:

Tom McClintock 49.5% of the vote

Arnold Schwarzenegger 48.4%

Cruz Bustamante 0.7%

Arianna Huffington 0.5%

William Tsangares 0.4%

Peter Camejo 0.2%

Larry Flynt 0.2%

John Zellhoefer 0.2%

Bill Simon 0.2%

http://www.christian-connection.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=index
271 posted on 09/20/2003 3:01:48 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
"Of course, I totally disagree with his [Schwarzenegger's] statement about impeachment, and am appalled at his having said that, can't imagine why he would."

You don't need to "imagine" anything. It's clear from Arnold's widely quoted comments that he considered Clinton's perjury and obstruction of justice to be minor offenses that are excusable in the President of the United States. Arnold characterized these crimes as mere "human failure."

It speaks volumes about Arnold's character. He approves of homosexuality and wants government to enhance its status in society. He approves of the killing of the unborn and wants to ensure that you and I continue to fund it through our taxes. And he obviously approved of keeping a law-breaking president in office.

This is the guy you're cheering on.

272 posted on 09/20/2003 3:03:13 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: Dave S
Ah, the old "unelectable" chant in stealth form. If winning is all that matters to you, why aren't you a Democrat?
273 posted on 09/20/2003 3:04:46 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Right Wing Crazy #5338526)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Amazing, isn't it?
274 posted on 09/20/2003 3:06:30 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Right is right...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
If winning is all that matters to you, why aren't you a Democrat?

"Winning isn't everything, but losing isn't anything."
Charles Schulz

275 posted on 09/20/2003 3:09:29 PM PDT by strela ("Piffle, dear, I don't have morals, just customs." Hilda Burroughs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Arnold Schwarzenegger's views in his own words:

238 posted on 09/08/2003 9:36 PM EDT by Godebert

276 posted on 09/20/2003 3:12:01 PM PDT by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Godebert
Vote for Arnold, win the booby prize.
277 posted on 09/20/2003 3:15:56 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: strela
The only losers from this recall will be liberals in the GOP.
278 posted on 09/20/2003 3:20:01 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Right Wing Crazy #5338526)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
The main thing I enjoy about the Kalifornia recall election is that it's smoked-out the liberals on this forum. You just can't can't much more liberal than Arnold. Read what he said about the Clinton impeachment. That's the dead give-away that he's a Clintonista liberal. Makes it all the more funny when you liberals refer to the Conservative as "McClintock".
279 posted on 09/20/2003 3:26:36 PM PDT by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Ooops...sorry Roscoe, I didn't mean to include you in that comment.
280 posted on 09/20/2003 3:29:09 PM PDT by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-295 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson