Skip to comments.
US Government - Bin Laden and Iraq Agreed to Cooperate on Weapons Development
New York Times, Facts on File World News Digest
| Novemeber 1998
| BENJAMIN WEISER
Posted on 09/19/2003 3:03:29 PM PDT by tallhappy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 141-160 next last
To: cyncooper
The Herald (Glasgow, Scotland), December 28, 1999. Iraq tempts bin Laden to attack West
Exclusive. By: Ian Bruce, Geopolitics Editor. THE world's most wanted man, Osama bin Laden, has been offered sanctuary in Iraq if his worldwide terrorist network succeeds in carrying out a campaign of high-profile attacks on the West ...
Good find!
61
posted on
09/19/2003 8:42:18 PM PDT
by
concerned about politics
(Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: cyncooper
U.S. Newswire, December 23, 1999. Terrorism Expert Reveals Why Osama bin Laden has Declared War On America; Available for Comment in Light of Predicted Attacks. ... (author Yossef) Bodansky also reveals the relationship between bin Laden and Saddam Hussein and how the U.S. bombing of Iraq is "strengthening the hands of militant Islamists eager to translate their rage into violence and terrorism." .... - - - - -
Sheesh! There's quite a bit out there about this! Good job!
62
posted on
09/19/2003 8:51:51 PM PDT
by
concerned about politics
(Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: concerned about politics
In addition, al Qaeda reached an understanding with the Government of Iraq
. Cant you read? This is an allegation that is part of an indictment. It is not stated as fact.
United States Information Agency, 04 November 1998 . It has been published.
Apparently you cant read. My question about releasing information was not about this information but rather the much, much more that that you referred to. Sheesh!
63
posted on
09/19/2003 8:57:18 PM PDT
by
thtr
To: concerned about politics
BTTT this thread. Great info. Must see.
64
posted on
09/19/2003 8:58:09 PM PDT
by
concerned about politics
(Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: thtr
Check out post #60. That might keep you busy for awhile.
BTW, what does thtr stand for? The Troll?
65
posted on
09/19/2003 9:00:24 PM PDT
by
concerned about politics
(Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: concerned about politics
The real question all of this raises is how did Clinton sit on his hands and Albright spout off about the positive developments in Iran and our need to nurture that relationship. Instead we have 3,000+ Americans killed on our soil and the likes of Senator Levin looking to blame one or two civil servants for not passing along memos. Give me a break, the writing was obviously all over. Saddam remained in violation of over a dozen UN resolutions while bin Laden declared war on the United States and proceeded to attack us at will.
Sorry for the rant, I just can't help myself when I think of the recklessness of the Clinton administration and now so many of the Democrats today.
66
posted on
09/19/2003 9:06:30 PM PDT
by
Dolphy
To: Dolphy
Sorry for the rant, I just can't help myself when I think of the recklessness of the Clinton administration and now so many of the Democrats today. No problem. I agree with you.
Heard about the book titled "Losing Bin Ladin?" It tells everything about the ignorance of the Clinton administration and their allowing numerous attacks against the U.S.
It's a MUST read. Know your enemy! It's not just the Muslims out to destroy America. Clinton actually aided the Muslims with many of his policies.
67
posted on
09/19/2003 9:11:34 PM PDT
by
concerned about politics
(Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: concerned about politics
It's a MUST read. Know your enemy! It's not just the Muslims out to destroy America. Clinton actually aided the Muslims with many of his policies. PS....and Clark was his personal soldier.
68
posted on
09/19/2003 9:22:01 PM PDT
by
concerned about politics
(Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: tallhappy
This is one of those bits of non-existant evidence that keeps on not popping up in those blanket statements made by leftist opponents to American opposition to terrorist domination of the earth, much like the statements made by the Minneapolis Red Star editorial board and others. Good thing for them this simply does not exist, as sending examples of it to them might be quite embarassing, since their entire premise that Bush lied about Iraq/Al Qaida cooperation is based on the fact that you are not seeing the document that is right in front of your face right now. Otherwise, they would have to eat about a truckload of raw crow, in the public square, feathers and all. But, since this doesn't exist, they have little to worry about, right?
To: thtr
In addition, al Qaeda reached an understanding with the Government of Iraq
. Cant you read? This is an allegation that is part of an indictment. It is not stated as fact.
No.
The indictment concerns the bombings in Kenya and Tanzania. The part about al Qaeda and Iraq is stated as factual and is part of the backround. The allegations are specific to conspiracy to bomb the US embassies.
Your point, such as it is, about the validity of the claim would be worth discussing -- with someone other than you.
To: cyncooper
Thanks so much! Saved to Iraqi file favorites and with a better title so I can find it again.
Amazing this is the same media that is now pretending there was no linkage between Iraq and AQ and trying to twist the subject to means that if Iraq didn't directly commit 9/11, then the president lied.
71
posted on
09/20/2003 3:09:16 AM PDT
by
Peach
(The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: tallhappy
72
posted on
09/20/2003 3:31:58 AM PDT
by
risk
To: risk; tallhappy
73
posted on
09/20/2003 3:44:01 AM PDT
by
risk
To: cyncooper; Cronos
74
posted on
09/20/2003 6:24:01 AM PDT
by
MizSterious
(Support whirled peas!)
To: MizSterious; Peach
Amazing and chilling.
75
posted on
09/20/2003 7:48:09 AM PDT
by
cyncooper
(I believe VP Cheney)
To: dennisw; TopQuark; Alouette; veronica; weikel; EU=4th Reich; BrooklynGOP; Jimmyclyde; Buggman; ...
Also be sure to look at #74
Middle East list
If people want on or off this list, please let me know.
76
posted on
09/20/2003 8:07:30 AM PDT
by
knighthawk
(We all want to touch a rainbow, but singers and songs will never change it alone. We are calling you)
To: cyncooper
Well, the story is good, but my math stinks. :) Dec. 1999 to September 2001 is a bit more than what I stated. Still chilling. It indicates this might have been in the works since (at least) the time of this article.
77
posted on
09/20/2003 8:07:57 AM PDT
by
MizSterious
(Support whirled peas!)
To: MizSterious
I just read your links, and later I'll do a search such as you suggested.
But, don't forget---The Cole bombing did happen less than a year later, so you were right, after all.
78
posted on
09/20/2003 8:19:50 AM PDT
by
cyncooper
(I believe VP Cheney)
To: cyncooper
The Cole attack should have made the administration very hot under the collar and made them put massive pressure wherever they could. Is there any evidence they did?
79
posted on
09/20/2003 12:05:29 PM PDT
by
RobbyS
(nd)
To: RobbyS
Is there any evidence they did?The legacy....
80
posted on
09/20/2003 12:22:52 PM PDT
by
cyncooper
(I believe VP Cheney)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 141-160 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson