Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GOPcapitalist
I don't adhere to the belief that atrocities were committed against the civilian population as a whole (at least, in anything in excess of that which was normal for the times when large armies moved through populated areas). The plantations provided food and raw materials for the Confederacy, the towns and cities .. with their factories .. provided finished products and armaments for the Confederacy. In many instances, factories were making uniforms, arms, and equipment for the Confederate Army right up until the time Sherman's forces entered them. In one .. Columbia, I think .. they continued to make uniforms right up until the time that Sherman told the workers to take whatever cloth they wanted before the factory was destroyed.

"I suppose you also blame rape victims for not being able to hold off their attackers during the crime."

So, I suppose, by that line of thought, you also would have opposed to bombings of Germany and Japan during WWII as well, right?

28 posted on 09/22/2003 5:17:08 AM PDT by BlueLancer (Der Elite Møøsenspåånkængrüppen ØberKømmååndø (EMØØK))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: BlueLancer
Supporting attacks on civilians is really your own choice.

Most Christian conservatives disagree.

29 posted on 09/22/2003 6:00:48 AM PDT by JohnGalt (Vichycons-- Supporting Endless War Abroad; Appeasing the Welfare State at Home, Since 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: BlueLancer
I don't adhere to the belief that atrocities were committed against the civilian population as a whole (at least, in anything in excess of that which was normal for the times when large armies moved through populated areas).

That is an historically incorrect view. The northern armies far exceeded the ammount of destruction that is usual or tolerable for a large army to move through. In the more famous cases, they torched entire towns and cities - a wholly needless act of destruction intended solely to inflict harm upon the civilians there. Even if they had simply wanted to stop war productions they did not need to torch homes - rather simply dismantle the armaments factory. But they did not and instead levelled the entire town. Far more appalling were the little known executions they committeed on confederate civilians behind enemy lines. In Tennessee one union general drafted multiple "murder lists" of local civilians and sent firing squads out to execute them in bizarre and tortuous ways without trial and for "crimes" such as having a son in the confederate army. That kind of stuff may have been normal for large armies in the time of Rome but not in nineteenth century America.

30 posted on 09/22/2003 7:25:02 AM PDT by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson