A Brief Compilation of DemocRAT Hypocrisy

September 2003 | Persons Quoted

[jwalsh07]

bump

[BOBTHENAILER]

• Asked to name one country they would most like Iraq to model its new government on from five possibilities -- neighboring, Baathist Syria; neighbor and Islamic monarchy Saudi Arabia; neighbor and Islamist republic Iran; Arab lodestar Egypt; or the U.S. --the most popular model by far was the U.S. The U.S. was preferred as a model by 37% of Iraqis selecting from those five -- more than Syria, Iran and Egypt put together. Saudi Arabia was in second place at 28%. Again, there were important demographic splits. Younger adults are especially favorable toward the U.S., and Shiites are more admiring than Sunnis. Interestingly, Iraqi Shiites, coreligionists with Iranians, do not admire Iran's Islamist government; the U.S. is six times as popular with them as a model for governance.

Since you won't look it up yourself, lazy a$$hole, here is your answer to our building and Islamic state. As I said, read it and weep.

You can only insult and point other threads (as if that carries any weight). You don’t even have the courage to debate on you own; relying on others to come to your defense.

I'll debate your sorry a$$ anyday, anywhere, anytime. The above quote from the article you won't read is defeat number one. As to courage, name the place and time, pal, and I'll be there . I only pinged the others to expose a DU troll, so all could see. I don't need their help with you.

The fact is (and it is a fact) there are no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

Prove it.

[arasina]

Terrific compilation of Democrat hypocrisy. Saving this one!

[BOBTHENAILER]

Thanks, but I found out earlier, that kayak posted the same thing within a thread a day or so ago.

I've been dueling with a DU troll and I found Kayak's posting of this to another thread.

Didn't mean to steal your thunder Kayak, but I found your posting within another thread when tracking the postings of one "thtr".

[arasina]

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002.

What a treasonous piece of dung Graham is. I can't find the darned quote from the recent debate aired on FNC, but it was summarized in a report like this:

"...the Democratic candidates attacked President Bush for the state of postwar Iraq, with Sen. Bob Graham of Florida charging that Bush had deliberately misled the country before the war.

[thtr]

As I said, read it and weep

Oh my God, You are actually basing you argument on a poll????? And who took this poll, and who was polled? This is laughable! - You have no understanding of Middle Eastern culture. There is absolutely no chance that Iraq will establish a democracy. The second our troops leave, the country will dissolve into civil war. (Perhaps sooner). Meanwhile the US taxpayer will spend years sinking money into a bottomless pit of re-building schemes designed to keep party contributors happy and fat. The sad thing is Republicans like you will politely “bend over” and pay the price.

Prove it

There is nothing to prove. They don’t exist. You can’t prove some doesn’t exist because… it doesn’t exist. But the fact that you can’t point to any evidence, and that our government has not pointed to any evidence re-enforces the fact that WMD do not exist in Iraq.

I’ll ignore all the “tough man” talk, the boorish language and the hackney “DU troll” talk; it’s typical of those that can’t phrase an argument.

[bjcintennessee]

I forwarded this to two of my sisters in Texas. One is pro-Bush, the other extremely anti-Bush. Can't wait to hear from the latter. (LOL)

[FreedomCalls]

bump.

[BOBTHENAILER]

I’ll ignore all the “tough man” talk, the boorish language and the hackney “DU troll” talk; it’s typical of those that can’t phrase an argument.

As we used to say in New Mexico,

DON'T LET YOUR MOUTH CASH A CHECK, YOUR ASS CAN'T BACK UP.

[BOBTHENAILER]

Hve fun with the latter.

[bjcintennessee]

Hve fun with the latter.

I plan to. I already alerted my other sister to listen out her window for the yelling of both my sister and her husband (from at least 600 miles away). (LOL)

I have never engaged them in much political discussion -- I know their views, they know mine. And I've been told my brother-in-law gets really volitile about Bush, so I may have made a critical mistake.

[BOBTHENAILER]

have never engaged them in much political discussion -- I know their views, they know mine. And I've been told my brother-in-law gets really volitile about Bush, so I may have made a critical mistake.

No critical mistake. We need to hammer this point all the time.

[BOBTHENAILER]

this comes down to the old wid west....you ready for the challenge?

or are you gonna hide behind the net?

[Darksheare]

If you honestly think it's that easy to find WMD, then you go and volunteer your services and find it.

Oh, and WMD CAN fit in a shoebox.
You know what Ricin is, right?
Well, enough Ricin to kill every man woman and child in NYC can fit in a stride-rite box.

Again, if you think it's SO easy to find WMD, YOU go and look for it yourself.
We'll be watching your progress. Au revoir.

[CAfraudPI]

O.K. I've go to get in on this... Let's all just take a breath. If SH had no WMD's, why on earth didn't he present proof that he did not have them and avoid the war? Your argument is illogical to me. Please advise...

[ampat]

Makes you wonder how some people can take these liers as serious candidates for president.

[Darksheare]

The same way people apparently took Hillary serious about not running for NY Sinator, and then running for Sinator, and then saying she'll serve out her term, 'honest'.

Don't worry, I don't get it either, but it makes for humor when the left says one thing and does another.
And the Cool-Aid drinkers of the left go, "They lied tome before, but maybe THIS time they're not."
That's the thinking they apply to almost everything they do.

[Darksheare]

"There is nothing to prove. They don’t exist."
Interesting, if laughable, position.
It should be easy to prove whether or not something exists or not.
"You have no understanding of Middle Eastern culture."
And I suppose you will claim that you do.
"But the fact that you can’t point to any evidence, and that our government has not pointed to any evidence re-enforces the fact that WMD do not exist in Iraq."
Bill Clinton's 'You can't prove I did it' line polished up and used by you, hmm.
Silence on a subject is not the same as lack of a subject.
They really haven't said one way or another.
That you interpret this to be lack of evidence points out several things about your personality.
None of them good.

If you think it's so easy to find WMD, then volunteer your services in looking for them and go look for them yourself.
You seem to think that it's so easy to find them.

[thtr]

If SH had no WMD's, why on earth didn't he present proof that he did not have them and avoid the war? Your argument is illogical to me. Please advise...

One cannot present proof that one does not possess something. It is like saying, prove to me that you don’t own a Buick. No matter what you say, you could still have one hidden somewhere. It is impossible to “prove” that something does not exist. Saddam said he no longer had weapons of mass destruction. US intelligence said that not only did he have the weapons but there was a significant threat that he would use those weapons. We went to war to find and destroy those weapons. Now we can’t find any real evidence that they indeed do exist. We have been looking for them for 5 months (since the end of the major war effort). The UN inspectors looked for them for 6 months prior to that. If the US intelligence was so sure (enough to send soldiers into harms way) then where are the weapons?