Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Common Tator
"It has declared the recall election unconstitutional as planned based on the Supreme court Decision made in the Bush-Gore case in 2000."

===

Isn't that just the excuse? If voters get "disenfrenchised" because they had to use punch cards, then by the same token last November's election is invalid too, we used the same machines. So let's have another full election.
30 posted on 09/15/2003 1:38:44 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: FairOpinion
Isn't that just the excuse? If voters get "disenfrenchised" because they had to use punch cards, then by the same token last November's election is invalid too, we used the same machines. So let's have another full election.

The rationale of the 9th Circuit decision was that it violates equal protection to use punchcards in some counties but not in others. (The State had previously agreed, in settling a prior lawsuit, to eliminate punchcard voting machines. This has already been done in some counties but won't be completed in all counties until March 2004.)

38 posted on 09/15/2003 1:46:09 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson