[Peach]

This did not copy in as readable format as the original National Review article. Sorry.

It gets old listening to people say the president misled us because he said the threat was imminent. This article makes clear he never said that and in fact, said the opposite (from the article below):

Perhaps they are "very, very reluctant" because of the fact that President Bush said exactly the opposite. In his state of the union address this year, Bush was at pains to disclose that the Iraq threat was not imminent, but that a controversial pre-emptive strike was nevertheless justified. Bush said, "Some have said we must not act until the threat is imminent. Since when have terrorists and tyrants announced their intentions, politely putting us on notice before they strike?"

[Grampa Dave]

When do Lunatic Libs like Krugman lie?