To: Peach
This did not copy in as readable format as the original National Review article. Sorry.
It gets old listening to people say the president misled us because he said the threat was imminent. This article makes clear he never said that and in fact, said the opposite (from the article below):
Perhaps they are "very, very reluctant" because of the fact that President Bush said exactly the opposite. In his state of the union address this year, Bush was at pains to disclose that the Iraq threat was not imminent, but that a controversial pre-emptive strike was nevertheless justified. Bush said, "Some have said we must not act until the threat is imminent. Since when have terrorists and tyrants announced their intentions, politely putting us on notice before they strike?"
2 posted on
09/15/2003 8:31:16 AM PDT by
Peach
(The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: Peach
When do Lunatic Libs like Krugman lie?
9 posted on
09/15/2003 8:58:32 AM PDT by
Grampa Dave
(May our brave warriors kill all of the Islamokazis/facists/nazis to prevent future 9/11's.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson