[OkiMusashi]

"Your ignorance on this issue is showing. Please research before you make such foolish statements. Those who believe in the “Doctrine of Preemption” are a well-published lot and there names are known to the well read. Learn something about the issue then ridicule, not the other way around."

Been there. Done that. It still doesn't change the way the term is used. It is a club ... just like Ultra-Lib. It is useless hype. Use it if you wish, but don't pretend that it has any meaning.

Oh, and don't mistake my reluctance to join in the hype as a sign of ignorance. If people would just go back and read Bush's SOTU Address a couple of years ago, Iraq would make all the sense in the world. (It's kinda nice to see a guy have the guts to back up what he says, every once in a while.)

Some of us were not born yesterday. :)

Mush the Micro-Ultra-Paleo-Neo-Con trying very hard not to become a Necro-Con

[Theyknow]

Oh, and don't mistake my reluctance to join in the hype as a sign of ignorance. If people would just go back and read Bush's SOTU Address a couple of years ago, Iraq would make all the sense in the world. (It's kinda nice to see a guy have the guts to back up what he says, every once in a while.)

Some of us were not born yesterday. :)

Mush the Micro-Ultra-Paleo-Neo-Con trying very hard not to become a Necro-Con

Do you have even the slightest idea of where the doctrine originated and who originated it? Please share and I will accept that you know even a pit about what you are saying, otherwise all your posts have done is display a total lack of knowledge.