14 Sep 2003 07:08:59 GMT
Iran says cooperation with IAEA open to debate
TEHRAN, Sept 14 (Reuters) - Iran's Foreign Ministry said on Sunday Tehran was debating whether to continue cooperation with the U.N.'s nuclear watchdog which last week gave Iran seven weeks to prove it had no secret atomic weapons programme.
Iran insists it has no nuclear arms ambitions and accuses Washington of seeking a pretext to invade the Islamic Republic as it had its neighbours Afghanistan and Iraq.
"The nature of our cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is under consideration," Foreign Ministry spokesman Hamid Reza Asefi told a weekly news conference.
"The relevant authorities are discussing it and our decision will be made public in future. We haven't made a concrete decision on how to continue cooperation with the IAEA," he said.
The IAEA has accused Tehran of failing to come clean about its nuclear programme. Iran says its nuclear facilities are solely geared to generating electricity.
A resolution passed by the IAEA's governing board on Friday called on Iran to clear up lingering doubts by October 31 and suspend all uranium enrichment activities for the time being.
The resolution implied that should the IAEA still have concerns about Iran's nuclear activities in November, it could declare Tehran in breach of international obligations and report it to the U.N. Security Council for possible economic sanctions.
In an interview with the German weekly Der Spiegel Iran's ambassador to the IAEA Ali Akbar Salehi warned that Tehran could follow North Korea's lead by pulling out of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).
Asked on Monday if Iran would pull out of the NPT, Asefi reiterated that cooperation with the IAEA was under review.
Diplomats in Tehran said Iran's decision-making process was complicated by divisions in the ruling establishment.
While the reformist government led by President Mohammad Khatami has been pushing for greater cooperation with the IAEA, powerful hardliners close to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei have argued the opposite.
"The IAEA board's tough statement may have given hardliners greater ammunition to argue that cooperation with the IAEA merely invites greater pressure on the country," one said.
http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/L14518596.htmSplintered mujahedeen ready to harass US troops, Kurds and Tehran
Splinter elements within the People’s Mujahedeen have taken to the rugged mountains separating Iran and Iraq, and were preparing to wage attacks against US troops, ethnic Kurds and Tehran, local officials and military sources said.
But US commanders and local sources insist their capabilities are limited after the bulk of Mujahedeen, also known by its Persian name Mujahedeen-e Khalq (MEK), hatched a deal with coalition authorities and withdrew to nearby Camp Ashraf in April.
Lieutenant Colonel Thomas Cantwell, Commandant of Camp Ashraf, said the 4,000 MEK members in the former Mujahedeen base were consolidated, detained, disarmed and were being screened for any past terrorist acts.
“All vehicles, arms and ammunition is under coalition control, they do not even carry a bayonet,” Cantwell, a Battalion Commander with the 324 Military Police, said.
The MEK has been classified by Washington as a terrorist outfit but Cantwell said this did not mean that each member of the MEK was a terrorist, hence the screening process to determine each individual’s legal status.
“It’s about restraint of the use of force and compliance with the Geneva Conventions, we’re especially trained in that, and that’s why we’re here,” Cantwell said.
He said the screening process and heavy restrictions on movement was taking a toll on the Mujahedeen, who are only allowed routine shopping trips into the town of Khalis under a heavy military escort.
“There’s nothing here that’s cushy and there is a fair degree of anxiety among them about their future,” he told AFP.
The MEK was a well-armed, secular fighting force that with backing from Saddam Hussein had continued a guerrilla insurgency against the hardline Islamic government in Tehran since the Iran-Iran war ended in 1988.
Their equipment included British Chieftain and Russian T-55 tanks.
One military source said the MEK had initially fled its bases along the Iranian border in southern Iraq as the United States was preparing to launch its March 20 invasion of Iraq from Kuwait.
The source, and members of the local branch of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK), one of the main political parties in the area, said about 5,000 rebels then converged on the two bases near Jalawla about 30 kilometres west of the Iranian border in late March.
Those bases are now empty of rebels, occupied solely by looters and scrap-metal merchants who moved in after the Mujahedeen shifted to Camp Ashraf.
Deputy chief of the PUK branch in nearby Saadhiyah, Abdul al-Karim Mahmud, said the Americans began bombing the bases at about the same time as Saddam was being ousted from power on April 9.
“But the bombings were designed to frighten the MEK, not kill them, and then there were long negotiations with the Americans and the MEK,” he said.
He said eventually a deal was hammered out and most of the MEK agreed to relocate to Camp Ashraf but more than 1,000 of the rebels refused to move, kept their arms and headed into the mountains.
“Now they are fighting the Americans, the Kurds and the Iranians,” he said.
“The PUK were against Saddam, the Mujahedeen were with Saddam and they fought against the Kurds in the 1991 uprising. They refused to make peace with us so now they are fighting against the Americans and the PUK,” he said.
The military source, a senior officer based in the area, agreed.
“They had for a long time operated camps in southern Iraq, then pulled up to the border area to the north and west of Baghdad before the US began its invasion,” he said.
He said all the camps in the south, like those in Jalawla, and near Baghdad were empty and looted, except for Camp Ashraf which sits about 100 kilometres west of the Iranian border and 60 kilometres north of Baghdad.
There are some rebels still out there “but there is no way of telling exactly how many,” he said.
Washington announced on April 22 it had reached a ceasefire with the MEK and the following day Mujahedeen officials said the agreement allowed the MEK to keep its weapons and carry on its activities in Iran from Camp Ashraf.
But Cantwell said any such claims were non-existent by June when troops from the 324 Military Police took control of Camp Ahraf and the MEK was consolidated and “all weapons secured by MPs.”
He declined to comment on current MEK strength or any operations the rebels could conduct against the Americans, Iranian-government forces or the PUK.
“But I will say a substantial number have agreed to consolidate in one camp,” he said, “at Camp Ashraf.”
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_14-9-2003_pg4_10