[BJungNan]

This was a sleeze piece. That is what I see the post thoughout this thread saying. You make a falacious argument when you say that because someone is calling this article a smear job that they support everything Arnold stands for.

In other words, your argument does not logically follow (If I say that the article is a smear, then I must love Arnold).

[Spiff]

This was a sleeze piece. That is what I see the post thoughout this thread saying. You make a falacious argument when you say that because someone is calling this article a smear job that they support everything Arnold stands for. In other words, your argument does not logically follow (If I say that the article is a smear, then I must love Arnold).

So, I'll ask the question a little differently. What accusation would an article have to make and who would have to make it before the Arnoldbots on Free Republic would NOT just call it a "sleeze piece"? Where is the line drawn? Tell you what, if Arnold turned out to be Larry Flynt in a Terminator mask, as long as that (R) is after the name and he was still polling well, the Arnoldbots here would still be supporting him.