Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: montag813
It's not her property at all if she is not allowed to refuse the sale.
111 posted on 09/12/2003 10:32:33 AM PDT by Liberal Classic (Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: Liberal Classic
It's not her property at all if she is not allowed to refuse the sale.

Or if she has to pay property taxes to keep it.

Or if the government can decide what peacefull activities she can engage in on her property.

Or what plants she can grow and use on her property.

Or if she has to ask government permission to build, alter or tear down a house on her property.

I'd be curious as to how many people against eminent domain believe that the government has the legitimate power to do any of the above.

113 posted on 09/12/2003 10:40:43 AM PDT by HurkinMcGurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

To: Liberal Classic; TheLurkerX; mhking; CaptIsaacDavis
But eminent domain is nothing new. Please see my Post 151
153 posted on 09/12/2003 1:21:18 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson