To: william clark
And you think they don't have any dirt on McClintock? If Arnold drops out they'll start calling him anti-choice, anti-immigrant, etc. and end his campaign right then and there. Plus, McClintock doesn't have any money to run TV ads. When the media stops calling attention to his fiscal strengths, how's he going to get his message out?
To: spam_bank
And you think they don't have any dirt on McClintock? If Arnold drops out they'll start calling him anti-choice, anti-immigrant, etc. and end his campaign right then and there.And just how is "anti-choice, anti-immigrant, etc." "dirt?"
McClintock is the TRUE conservative in the race and now you're going to call his principles, which I though were those of most on FR, "dirt?"
Unbelievable.
105 posted on
09/10/2003 1:37:13 PM PDT by
A2J
To: spam_bank; william clark
"And you think they don't have any dirt on McClintock? If Arnold drops out they'll start calling him anti-choice, anti-immigrant, etc. and end his campaign right then and there. "So very true. Let's not forget how the media will re-label him as the "Ultra-conservative" candidate as well. Just to turn off moderates and really scuttle his chances. Why people here don't realize that is beyond me.
142 posted on
09/10/2003 1:57:50 PM PDT by
Tempest
(I've lost all hope for half of you.)
To: spam_bank
There's a big difference between smears and accurately stating his position on things like abortion, etc. As for TV ads; true, he doesn't have the bucks to run as many as Arnold, but the air time he's getting for free by way of interviews, where he can speak in complete sentences instead of quick sound bytes, is worth more than an ad if timed properly.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson