To: meg70
Uberroth was polling at 5% in the field poll....splitting his vote will not take the elad from bustamente.
3 posted on
09/09/2003 3:17:07 PM PDT by
finnman69
(!)
To: finnman69
I think the CA. Field Poll is notoriously unreliable, I'd wait for more solid numbers before planning strategery.
7 posted on
09/09/2003 3:19:50 PM PDT by
meg70
To: finnman69
I hate to say it, but Arnold has one huge advantage over Bustamante:
Everyone knows "Schwartzenegger" is running. It's even easy to find, being the longest name. But do you realize that 70% of Demonrats can't even name ONE primary contestant?
And, apologies to Californians here... YOu guys are the exceptions to the rule, as your presence indicates... But Californians are the most politically ignorant people in the U.S.
These polls are skewed because they usually list the names for the voters. How many voters do you think will be able to remember that "Bustamante" is the leading Democrat, and find him in a list of 135 names?
Frankly, John Jacobsjingleheimerschmidt (easy to spot) would probably run neck and neck with Bugs Bunny (easy to remember) in the polls if they could both run.
45 posted on
09/09/2003 3:59:41 PM PDT by
dangus
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson