Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Leni Riefenstahl dies at 101; Known for Nazi Era Propoganda Films
AP

Posted on 09/09/2003 4:06:46 AM PDT by sonsofliberty2000

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 last
To: sonsofliberty2000
Our outrage with the Nazis was highly selective. I notice that although Werner von Braun masterminded the V2 project, he was spirited away to the United States and later celebrated as a hero.

Riefenstahl was a cinematic artist. Like many artists, she divorced herself from the subject of her composition, and concentrated on the art for its own sake. That leads to such seeming paradoxes as Triumph of the Will, where sublime beauty is invoked to glorify ultimate evil.

101 posted on 09/09/2003 3:27:45 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: veronica
she has the blood of thousands and thousands on her hands.

That's a stretch ... She no more has blood on her hands for glorifying Nazism than Tchaikovsky has for celebrating the Russian victory at Moscow. Artists are often paid to glorify their patrons. The measure of their ability isn't the beauty of the subject, but how well they succeed in their task. At that, Riefenstahl was a virtuoso.

102 posted on 09/09/2003 3:43:37 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ffusco
She is no better than Speer (Architect and weapons procurement for the Reich) or other mid level party members who designed ingenious ways to destroy unwanted people.

Really? Speer supervised the Nazi industrial production program, and hence was deeply involved in the use of slave labor. Millions died because of his direct efforts and orders. Leni Riefenstahl essentially made a two hour commercial for the Nazis, plus an essentially apolitical sports film, and never did a thing for them after 1938, and yet you say that they are morally the same?

103 posted on 09/09/2003 3:56:02 PM PDT by Heyworth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Heyworth
Am I being overly cynical in believing that 90% of the posters attacking Riefenstahl would've been touting the (Nazi)party line and goose-stepping in time to the cadence if they had been living in 1930s/40s Germany and needed to do so to provide for their family's security?
104 posted on 09/09/2003 6:59:32 PM PDT by Steve_Stifler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
The hilarious thing is that Olympia exudes homoerotica

That may just be in the eye of the viewer.

105 posted on 09/10/2003 6:47:11 AM PDT by Oztrich Boy ("Pillage, THEN Burn")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Heyworth
Yes, morally equal, but not guilty of the same crimes.
106 posted on 09/10/2003 7:27:30 AM PDT by ffusco (Maecilius Fuscus,Governor of Longovicium , Manchester, England. 238-244 AD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: weegee
And I will bet that the amount of royalities went up during that period as more people were likely to be buying it. Talk about irony, LoL.
107 posted on 09/10/2003 9:59:23 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree. Bush must be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy
I haven't seen but a few frames from Olympia (I saw the documentary on Leni and have seen some shots in books).

This whole "homoerotic" thing I just don't get. This was a woman behind the camera. How is her obsessing over the bodies of men homoerotic? If a guy had made it the case could be made. Are people referring to the way she shot women?

If a man makes a statue or drawing of a nude figure, is it automatically "homoerotic" if it is of a man?

108 posted on 09/10/2003 1:41:28 PM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Stifler
Perhaps if you are thinking that 90% of the crowd here are moral relativists, unable to identify absolutes of black/white, good/evil.
109 posted on 09/10/2003 1:43:38 PM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Stifler
Am I being overly cynical in believing that 90% of the posters attacking Riefenstahl would've been touting the (Nazi)party line and goose-stepping in time to the cadence if they had been living in 1930s/40s Germany and needed to do so to provide for their family's security?

Sadly, probably not. It's easy to condemn Hitler in hindsight, knowing what we know today. But the facts are, most Americans in the mid 30's tolerated, and many even supported Hitler and what he was doing for Germany. They didn't know that all along he was planning for war, and the holocaust. Although I maintain anyone who would have taken the time to read "Mein Kampf" should have known.

110 posted on 09/10/2003 1:48:31 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Stifler
I also forgot to add that most Brits considered Churchill a nutcase when he warned the world about Hitler in the 30s.
111 posted on 09/10/2003 1:49:56 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson