To: pram; WackyKat
yeah!
is it only neo-con? is cheney a neo-con? rummy? whats with the neo-con thing? are you saying that some conservatives were FOR saddam? for iraqi nukes (if there are any)? for oppression of the kurds? sure you can no and that those things are straw man and the real point is the us role in the world. but in the end, what is the real point?
165 posted on
09/06/2003 10:57:37 PM PDT by
APRPEH
(dont forget to rinse)
To: pram; WackyKat
wasnt it the "neo-con" brits who had the so-called evidence? and the "neo-con" un weapons inspectors who had cataloged what was in iraq when they were thrown out? and the "neo-con: clintonites who threatened war over the same issue? to which neo-cons do you refer?
166 posted on
09/06/2003 10:59:30 PM PDT by
APRPEH
(dont forget to rinse)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson