Skip to comments.
Bush on warpath over UN's shock report on Iran A-bomb (Dubya is Angry!)
The Daily Telegraph ^
| 09/07/2003
| Con Coughlin
Posted on 09/06/2003 6:09:24 PM PDT by Pubbie
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-190 next last
To: Lord_Baltar
Why exactly is it OK for us to have, develop, manufactuer, and test Nukes, and it's not OK for other Nations to do so?
I guess it's the same thinking that says it's okay for me to have a gun, but not okay for John Lee Malvo to have one.
41
posted on
09/06/2003 6:44:02 PM PDT
by
Quanah
To: Brian S
Let's see what Bush talks about tomorrow night, shall we?
I've got a sense that something big is in the wind.
42
posted on
09/06/2003 6:44:43 PM PDT
by
Poohbah
(Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women.)
To: Lord_Baltar
Why exactly is it OK for us to have, develop, manufactuer, and test Nukes, and it's not OK for other Nations to do so? Are you really that stupid, or are you just trying to pick a fight?
It's because the US doesn't think it's our mission from Allah to incinerate everybody else on the planet. We actually prefer that everybody else have the freedom of thought to determine their own peaceful destiny, a concept alien to Islam.
43
posted on
09/06/2003 6:44:43 PM PDT
by
ovrtaxt
( http://www.fairtax.org ** God may not be a Republican, but Satan is definitely a Democrat!)
To: Pubbie
Although Mr al-Baradei admits that the Iranians have deployed a variety of delaying tactics to prevent UN inspectors gaining access to secret nuclear facilities, he believes that they should be given more time to comply with their obligations under the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty. Isn't he the same idiot that didn't catch the N. Korea's nukes???
44
posted on
09/06/2003 6:44:50 PM PDT
by
Mo1
(http://www.favewavs.com/wavs/cartoons/spdemocrats.wav)
To: Lord_Baltar
Why exactly is it OK for us to have, develop, manufactuer, and test Nukes, and it's not OK for other Nations to do so? OK to whom? To whom are we supposed to justify our decisions?
45
posted on
09/06/2003 6:46:39 PM PDT
by
wizardoz
(Paranoia. It's what's for dinner.)
To: Pubbie
Have we received an intelligence report from Tony Blair on this yet? Always good to have the Brits provide confirmation.
Richard W.
46
posted on
09/06/2003 6:47:53 PM PDT
by
arete
(Greenspan is a ruling class elitist and closet socialist who is destroying the economy)
To: PhiKapMom
Be nice if he said "After further discussion, we have decided to withdraw from the United Nations and seek alliances with Countries that want to fight the War on Terror!"
I know -- I am dreaming! If the UN keeps playing these delaying games regarding Nukes and WMD ... I would not rule that out from happening some day soon
47
posted on
09/06/2003 6:47:55 PM PDT
by
Mo1
(http://www.favewavs.com/wavs/cartoons/spdemocrats.wav)
To: ovrtaxt
I'm probably that stupid, as I usually prefer not to pick a fight...
To: Lord_Baltar
Honestly, I do not want to have you backing me into a corner and have me saying things that I cannot support due to my not considering them at length.
I am willing to say, however, that I see nothing wrong with kicking the asses of sucky little nations that have proven them selves to be unworthy of respectable treatment.
Are you suggesting that we should actually negotiate terms with the likes of the leaders of Iran and North Korea? Do you really want them to join the elite club of Atomic Powered Nations? Do you understand what that could develop into?
Would you let a proven sex offender near your children? Would you let a homicidal maniac have a gun in a public place? What the hell else is the world's superpower supposed to do?
We should maintain law and order. That makes sense to me. Would you like to have an Islamic fundamentalist state dictating to you what order should be like? Would you like to have a despotic communist rogue murderous bastard ordering you around?
Wake up!
49
posted on
09/06/2003 6:49:08 PM PDT
by
Radix
To: Lord_Baltar
Perhaps because Iran is and has been the number one exporter of terrorism for more than a decade?
Hamas with nukes
Nothing to worry about there
I guess youre Mr. PC, were all countries and cultures are equal. Theyre not.
50
posted on
09/06/2003 6:49:23 PM PDT
by
DB
(©)
To: Lord_Baltar
By the way, did you see Destro's remark about countries who have signed the non-proliferation treaty?
51
posted on
09/06/2003 6:49:39 PM PDT
by
wizardoz
(Paranoia. It's what's for dinner.)
To: Poohbah
Considering it's the Sunday BEFORE 9-11, I find it intriguing that he's speaking before that day, and not on that day. Hmmm...
52
posted on
09/06/2003 6:49:42 PM PDT
by
rintense
(9-11-01: Never Forget.)
To: Lord_Baltar
It was post #27, if you didn't see it.
53
posted on
09/06/2003 6:50:38 PM PDT
by
wizardoz
(Paranoia. It's what's for dinner.)
To: Lord_Baltar
Maybe you can explain this to me, because my Room Temperature IQ is struggling with this. Why exactly is it OK for us to have, develop, manufactuer, and test Nukes, and it's not OK for other Nations to do so?You MUST be joking right? I think you can answer that one yourself, unless you are truly a MORON.
To: Poohbah
Let's see what Bush talks about tomorrow night, shall we? I've got a sense that something big is in the wind.
Oh Christ...don't tell me the additional $$$ request to Congress will be greater that the $70 billion already rumored? That would be "big"...
55
posted on
09/06/2003 6:52:07 PM PDT
by
Brian S
To: Poohbah
Do you know if the President has asked for time on the non-cable stations?
To: Poohbah
I wish I could wright that speech
Out of the UN shut out the frogs and the Germans
To: Pubbie; Lord_Baltar; hchutch; Chancellor Palpatine; concerned about politics
58
posted on
09/06/2003 6:52:57 PM PDT
by
nwrep
To: Destro
India GETS no money from America-maybe you meant Israel????I meant the people at the UN. We pay for most of it. 60% I hear.
Isreal? I say give them more. I feel so sorry for them.
59
posted on
09/06/2003 6:54:02 PM PDT
by
concerned about politics
(Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: rintense
Considering it's the Sunday BEFORE 9-11, I find it intriguing that he's speaking before that day, and not on that day. Hmmm... 9/11 is a day of memorial .. just like Pearl Harbor .. President Bush would never talk about Iraq or Iran on that day.
But I have to admit, this article got my interest up and what he might talk about
60
posted on
09/06/2003 6:54:21 PM PDT
by
Mo1
(http://www.favewavs.com/wavs/cartoons/spdemocrats.wav)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-190 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson