Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
If not then wouldn't that mean the state legislatures acted unconstitutionally in seceding, at least as Rawle saw it?

..."as Rawle saw it" being the operative words. This issue was actually debated at length in 1861 with some states concluding a convention was the way to exit the union. Others, such as Tennessee, explicitly rejected that concept and concluded that an act of the legislature was necessary.

760 posted on 09/25/2003 7:51:01 PM PDT by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 748 | View Replies ]


To: GOPcapitalist
..."as Rawle saw it" being the operative words.

Rawle also believed that unilateral secession was constitutional to begin with. Turns out he was wrong on that, too.

781 posted on 09/26/2003 3:57:39 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 760 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson