[stand watie]

if a supreme court was so VITAL to the new revolutionary government as your silly posts indicate you think it was to the new CSA, they didn't have to wait to set the USSC up until after the Constitution was written, the Contiential Congress could have done so by a simple act of that body.

the TRUTH is that the absense of a CSA supreme court during the war is a BIG ISSUE to YOU and to NOBODY ELSE.the structure of the CSA was a loosely bound confederation of independent states;in point of fact, i think a CSSC would have had few cases to decide, when after the war, the CSA government had gotten around to staffing it.(FURTHERMORE, the USA might be better off without the USSC-MUCH that they have done is WRONG MORALLY & LEGALLY in the minds of a majority of the citizens, like roe v. wade for example.)

it's a minor side issue that you like to bring up to beat us southrons around the head & shoulders with. sorry, we aren't interested in any more of that NONSENSE!

free dixie,sw

[Non-Sequitur]

if a supreme court was so VITAL to the new revolutionary government as your silly posts indicate you think it was to the new CSA, they didn't have to wait to set the USSC up until after the Constitution was written, the Contiential Congress could have done so by a simple act of that body.

What should have been important was compliance with the confederate constitution. As it turned out that was a matter of no importance to the Davis regime.

the TRUTH is that the absense of a CSA supreme court during the war is a BIG ISSUE to YOU and to NOBODY ELSE

You and the rest of the sothron horde harp endlessly on what you claim are violations of the Constitution by Lincoln, yet violations of the confederate constitution is not a big issue. Bit of a double standard, don't you think?