To: tpaine
The concept of an 'all powerful state', one that can ignore our constitutions restrictions, has always been a product of the states rights movement in america.What constitutional restrictions have the states righters ignored?
To: rustbucket
The concept of an 'all powerful state', one that can ignore our constitutions restrictions, has always been a product of the states rights movement in america.
-tpaine-
What constitutional restrictions have the states righters ignored?
-rb-
Lots, - but their support for the CA prohibitions on 'assault weapons' gets me the most.
There are dozens of self described conservatives on FR who ~insist~ that CA has a 'right' to so 'regulate' guns. -- IE, -- that our BOR's do not apply to a state.
Incredible. - In effect they are constitutional scofflaws, and are proud of it...
135 posted on
09/09/2003 10:29:39 AM PDT by
tpaine
( I'm trying to be Mr Nice Guy, but politics keep getting in me way. ArnieRino for Governator!)
To: rustbucket
What constitutional restrictions have the states rights proponents ignored?
How about the right of black Americans to own guns. The right of black Americans to vote, to travel by common coach, to educate their children in league with others in their neighborhood. The right to compete in the job market for work that they are capable of performing.
Not to mention the right to not be lynched, and to marry by mutual agreement.
Enough for a start?
730 posted on
09/24/2003 8:59:29 PM PDT by
donmeaker
(Bigamy is one wife too many. So is monogamy, or is it monotony?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson